- Posts
- 3,719
- Likes
- 4,202
WatchVaultNYC
·OK, 2 Royal Oaks - a 4100 and 14790 - all other things equal, which one is the keeper?
4100
14790
4100
14790
Royal Oak: 4100 or 14790?
- Posts
- 518
- Likes
- 966
wkimmd
·I recognized the 4100 from HQMilton.
In any case - I am a huge fan of "smaller watches" - most of my collection is in the 35-37mm range.
I've tried on both - there is something about the RO that screams to me that it should be 39mm...I don't know, maybe it is just me.
That being said, of these, I think I am in favor of the 14790.
In any case - I am a huge fan of "smaller watches" - most of my collection is in the 35-37mm range.
I've tried on both - there is something about the RO that screams to me that it should be 39mm...I don't know, maybe it is just me.
That being said, of these, I think I am in favor of the 14790.
- Posts
- 906
- Likes
- 1,454
AveConscientia
·4100 better finish and looks better all around
- Posts
- 3,719
- Likes
- 4,202
WatchVaultNYC
·the pix aren't the actual watches in question - its an "in general" sort of query
- Posts
- 1,199
- Likes
- 9,753
jens0125
·Top is money
- Posts
- 3,719
- Likes
- 4,202
WatchVaultNYC
·Top is money
- Posts
- 1,426
- Likes
- 1,430
sgrossma
·In general the top reference. Unless it is these two specific, I'd say bottom. The fading of the dial around the markers would drive me crazy.
