- Posts
- 109
- Likes
- 50
iht
·I’ve been thinking lately about how much Rolex’s image has evolved. Back in the mid-20th century, the brand was all about tool watches - pieces built for diving, aviation, racing, and exploration. They were worn by people who worked hard, pushed boundaries, and needed something tough and reliable on the wrist.
These days, though, it feels like Rolex sits in a very different cultural space - more a symbol of success and luxury than rugged practicality. Of course, the quality and precision are still there, but I wonder if the brand’s messaging and audience have shifted so much that the original “tool watch” ethos has been overshadowed.
Curious what others think: does Rolex today still stand for the same spirit of durability and adventure, or has it become something entirely different?
These days, though, it feels like Rolex sits in a very different cultural space - more a symbol of success and luxury than rugged practicality. Of course, the quality and precision are still there, but I wonder if the brand’s messaging and audience have shifted so much that the original “tool watch” ethos has been overshadowed.
Curious what others think: does Rolex today still stand for the same spirit of durability and adventure, or has it become something entirely different?