Hi everybody.
What is your opinion, is this dial original ? Information from the seller: "original 18 ct sigma dial". Sorry, no better pictures.

 

Here is a better picture:

 

@balaja
I've seen many sigma Daytona dials that have the sigma "unjustified" with the T's, similar, in a way, to this 1005, but above the T's. Other models with sigma dials (the Datedate, for example) show the sigma letter inline with the T.
I would think the sigma letters would be inline with the T's on this 1005; therefore I'd be cautious about purchasing the timepiece and would want to thoroughly inspect the dial "in hand" with a 10x loupe.
I'm interested to hear other's opinion on this watch.

 

The Rolex crown reaches the minute indices at 12. Is it normal ?

 

Not a pristine example with this dial, noted in the 12:00-2:00 damage.
Why pay a premium anyway... I think the dial looks fine..

 

Dial looks original to my untrained eye.

Wee bit of information on sigma dials https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/what-is-a-sigma-dial

 

Thanks for your answers, I think I'll pass it.

 

Hi,

The dial looks refinished, The font does not look correct, the printed minute markers are too long and the T Swiss Made T would have luminous on the dial but the dial doesn't have any luminous.

 

i vote repaint/redial. just my naked eye looking at the pics and something just a little off in the fonts.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

I'm far away from being an expert.
But looks like the font is a bit off. Look at the O and Cs. They are a bit bigger than the rest of the letters. Also, minute marks looks a bit differen length(especially one that touching the crown).

Just my $0.02 .