Rolex Daytona Cosmograph

Posts
6
Likes
3
Can anyone give me their input on this Daytona. The clasp doesn't look quit right. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Posts
257
Likes
698
R RUDEE
Can anyone give me their input on this Daytona. The clasp doesn't look quit right. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Does not look right to my eye for several reasons. Would love the experts to delineate why, if that is acceptable on the forum.
 
Posts
2,520
Likes
17,819
Fake, fake, fake.

just look at the positioning of the subdials — centered above the 3 and the 9 on the dial face.

For starters.
 
Posts
1,430
Likes
2,942
Do you know the reference number of the watch in question? Is it a 116518? Usually I see the yellow gold Daytona with a leather strap with Arabic markers, but I do know they made with baton hour markers. Regardless, the dial doesn't look correct... the font, the numbers, etc. nor does the clasp. Airansun, I know in older references the sub-dials were centered at the 3 and 9, but in the newer models the subdials are centered slightly above. For comparison, see the images below... look at "20" in sub-dials for example among other issues; the top of the numbers do not touch the edge of the sub-dial. See bottom image of older stainless steel model where the sub-dials are centered.

 
Posts
6,950
Likes
13,010
Zenith based Daytona's had the sub-dials aligned with 3 and 9, new Rolex movement are slightly above.
 
Posts
1,430
Likes
2,942
Zenith based Daytona's had the sub-dials aligned with 3 and 9, new Rolex movement are slightly above.
I still question the dial... it doesn't look right.

And yes, I'm aware of the different alignment of the sub-dials as noted in my post above.
 
Posts
2,520
Likes
17,819
Airansun, I know in older references the sub-dials were centered at the 3 and 9, but in the newer models the subdials are centered slightly above.
Zenith based Daytona's had the sub-dials aligned with 3 and 9, new Rolex movement are slightly above.

Never noticed before! I should know better than to comment on something I don’t know enough about.

The watch just looks really wrong to my eyes, particularly the dial.
 
Posts
285
Likes
356
Plenty of things look off with that, dial printing is a bit sketchy, the 'daytona' text looks to be too light a colour

The clasp is the exact replica of a poor fake I got some years ago, before I knew better, and the finishing to the underside of the case is a bit rough
 
Posts
13,046
Likes
52,017
Here is a thing every collector needs to be able to do, spot a fate in 5 seconds or less. Rick Harrison from Pawn Stars has a great principle: to paraphrase...Rolex is about perfection. If it isn’t perfect, it isn't real. That watch is a horror.

This is the deep end of the pool. If you are posting a watch like this, you are about to drown. Do your homework. Kudos for having the presence of mind to post.
Edited:
 
Posts
17,638
Likes
26,755
One look at the dial and I would nope out.
 
Posts
3,663
Likes
22,225
Any high ticket item that comes with bad pics = red flag and pass. If you're selling such a watch, the least you can do, if your not hiding anything, is to provide clear, crisp scans.
 
Posts
6,418
Likes
26,343
Faz Faz
Any high ticket item that comes with bad pics = red flag and pass. If you're selling such a watch, the least you can do, if your not hiding anything, is to provide clear, crisp scans.
Seriously! To add a ridiculous example to that- I was perusing watchrecon and found this listing. This is the only photo provided and the complete listing description. It has 261 bumps on top of that... I greatly appreciate the rules OF has for sales here.
Edited: