Forums Latest Members
  1. Omegist Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
    Hey fellow Omega addicts,

    I recently purchased these no 16 endlinks, but I am not definitely sure if they are genuine.

    They are missing the ridge underneath and the no 16 itself looks slightly different to the ones I have seen previously.
    I haven't seen any repros in the past..but these days everything is possible
    To all the no 16 owners: what do you think?
    I am looking forward for some feedback ::popcorn::
    Many thanks !
     
    image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg
    oddboy likes this.
  2. Omegist Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
    More pics..
     
    image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg
  3. cristos71 Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    7,155
    Likes
    32,933
    They look a bit iffy to me.....but I'll check my own later to be sure.
     
  4. Omegist Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
    thanks ! It would be great if you could take a look at yours
     
  5. incabloc Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    551
    Likes
    1,715
    as cristos say, they are looking iffy to me also.

    IMG_2076.JPG IMG_2077.JPG
     
    Omegist likes this.
  6. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Here are a pair.
    #16 end link.jpg
     
  7. Omegist Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
  8. Omegist Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
  9. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    The 16 on OP's pics look odd. Agree, iffy.
     
  10. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    The OP #16 obviously is printed at an angle and doesn't appear to match any others shown. Were there different versions? different manufacturers?
     
  11. Omegist Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
    I couldn't find any sophisticated infos regarding the no 16 endlinks...it seems there is a lack of data
    I have the impression they are even rarer than the no 6 or 516 which show up on eBay etc.. once a month
    it would be great if anyone got more infos and details about the no 16
     
  12. uwsearch Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    1,055
    Likes
    1,596
    50 years old but still new..

    IMG_6719.JPG
     
    JohnSteed and Omegist like this.
  13. flyingout Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    693
    Likes
    700
    MWO pairs the 16s with the 7912 bracelet for the 105.012-63 (20mm). Then with the 1506 between 1964 and 1966 for the same watch (replaced by the 516s sometime after). Hard to say if they are rarer that the 6s. All straight lug Speedies and Seamasters vs. three or so years of 105.012s and Seamasters?
     
    Edited Sep 2, 2016
  14. Kringkily Omega Collector / Hunter Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    5,505
    Likes
    4,781
    The 16 shoukd be printed horizontially not at an angle no?
     
    JohnSteed likes this.
  15. Omegist Sep 2, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
    I am thinking the same..does anyone know for sure? I still got the opportunity to return the endlinks..and they weren't cheap :(
     
  16. Omegist Sep 4, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
    sorry to worm up this thread one more time guys but is there anybody who can confirm that the ridge underneath and the horizontal stamp are obligate markers for the no 16 endlinks ?

    When looking at no 516 & 532 endlinks there is no ridge and the number itself is also stamped in a certain angle and not horizontal

    I am wondering if its possible that there were different generations for the no 16 endlinks? ...as for the no 6
    ...I just want to make sure before I return them...these endlinks are so hard to find...:(
     
    image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg
  17. rogart ray it again, Ram. Sep 4, 2016

    Posts
    1,007
    Likes
    408
    The rounded hole looks different? That is the most obvious thing i can spot.
    279069-21563861127d4670f76a14ba89f68a85.jpg
     
    Taddyangle likes this.
  18. Omegist Sep 4, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
    True; thats another difference; thanks for your contribution
     
  19. Omegist Sep 4, 2016

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    469
    I think I have to return them...too many red flags
    and the journey continues ::facepalm2::
     
  20. Schlotkins Mar 7, 2017

    Posts
    62
    Likes
    15