Forums Latest Members
  1. Seth Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    15
    Likes
    13
    Hi all,

    That is my first post in this quality forum. I have read many interesting stuff here for a while though!
    Long story short, I am mainly interested in pre-Moon Speedmaster's as a consequence of two of my passions/interests: watchmaking and atrophysics & space discovery.

    One topic I still not master fully concerns the redial/relume factor.
    Those days, I have been looking at a specific 105.012 from 1963 (Swiss Made) and I have got some doubts about its originality. Indeed, hands do not match indexes so I am not convinced about the those. Moreover, I would like your perspective on the dial itself.

    Thanks a lot for your passion and knowledge,

    Alex
    image2-3.jpg
    20160221_130045.png

    image2-2.jpg
     
    image2-1.jpg
    Edited Feb 21, 2016
  2. ibis888 Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    328
    Likes
    201
    I'm curious as to what the experts chime in with... The greenish tint on the hands is interesting... old superluminova?

    I don't think the hands alone would be a reason to not buy the watch though if everything else is correct and the price is right.
     
  3. Seth Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    15
    Likes
    13
    Thanks for the reply ibis. I am actually more concerned about the dial & indexes than about the hands. Curious to know if they have been touched. The price is fairly high but the watch is very nice overall (despite the bezel which looks like the dark side of the moon) and has some interesting attributes.
     
  4. Javi22 Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    211
    Likes
    574
    I think the experts can tell you if the Dial is relumed or not,::confused2:: my opinion ist that the Lume is not original.::popcorn::::shy::
     
  5. Dgercp Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    1,072
    Likes
    1,454
    I think the lume plots are redone. They appear sloppy and that banana yellow just seems wrong.
     
  6. Seth Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    15
    Likes
    13
    Javi, Dgercp,

    Thanks for the feedback. That confirms those doubts. I will wait for a better one.

    Alex
     
  7. Psych Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    221
    Likes
    366
    Should there be a SWISS MADE without T's on a PROFESSIONAL dial?
     
  8. Seth Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    15
    Likes
    13
    Psych,

    That is one of the nice attributes of this model. The regulation that stated to specify Tritium lume (the T) came out in 1964.
    This 105.012 was produced in 1963 and thus did not fall under the regulation. This batch was released in Q1 1964 (~ 200 watches). That is also interesting because it is the earliest professional (lyre) case, produced before some 105.003's.
     
  9. Psych Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    221
    Likes
    366
    Aha - thanks.

    Well, since it is clearly an interesting and rare Speedmaster and an attractive and good condition dial (regardless of bother about the luminous material), you should buy it. You'll regret it for ever if you don't. If you tire of it, there will surely be a queue of us lining up to buy it from you.
     
  10. Seth Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    15
    Likes
    13
    If so, I would feel it now already. I try to find only the best examples, this one would have been an impulse buy, also due to the lume, so if it is re-done... I will share a picture of my future 105.012 here when I find it.
     
  11. jayrock26 Feb 21, 2016

    Posts
    522
    Likes
    481
    no expert,

    but i honestly think its so hard to tell with the age and differing conditions a watch could have been exposed to in its lifetime. unless you are buying a piece for the sake of a financial estate in NOS or superb collectible condition. I dont think the lume holds much value as opposed to a good dial, bezel, case, and movement. its just too hard to tell and people get too caught up in it. if it speaks to you get it, if it doesnt then pass. i went through this same debate with my Speedmaster

    that's my two cents
     
  12. Seth Feb 22, 2016

    Posts
    15
    Likes
    13
    That is a fair point. I think this is mostly personal and in my case, I would not feel perfectly fine if I invest lots of money into a watch that has been artficially upgraded. I say artificially because in that case that is clearly some make-up that you put on a watch to make it look better, or more appealing in case it is put back on the market.

    We are talking about an irrational good anyway, so, ihmo, it is no more irrational to look for what one considers good enough, be the original lume (or a latter crown, like on my 105.003!)
     
  13. Cal_321 Feb 22, 2016

    Posts
    277
    Likes
    427
    I've seen some Speedies with this banana-colored lume, I'm more concerned about the "jittered/sloppy" lume-indexes ...
     
    richardew likes this.
  14. richardew Feb 22, 2016

    Posts
    446
    Likes
    530
    The dial looks like it was relumed poorly with the relume extending past the indexes in many places. The hands don't match the dial and as pointed out they have a green hue to them. The color of the lume is not concerning but it was put on the dial poorly. Finding that particular dial will be difficult, let alone expensive. Here's a couple of mine with the "banana" lume, which is matched by the hands.
    12.30.12 _22speedys n coffee.jpg 12.30.12 _26speedys n coffee.jpg
     
    sigma089 and Pahawi like this.
  15. Seth Feb 22, 2016

    Posts
    15
    Likes
    13
    Hi Richard,
    Pretty rare dial indeed. You have got some very nice ones!
     
    Edited Feb 22, 2016