Redial or original?

Locked
Posts
324
Likes
510
My friends, friend had his friend look at it and were waiting for his brother to contact his friends uncles. aunt twice removed whose mailing their response through the post office.
 
Posts
328
Likes
441
Joking aside, my gut says original. Waiting for the experts to chime in.
 
Posts
365
Likes
452
A picture of the movement and of the back case inside would be helpful.
Edited:
 
Posts
41
Likes
131
my uneducated and highly biased opinion....original
 
Posts
365
Likes
452
It´s a redial in my opinion. And i don´t appreciate when this forum is used by people not reveal more information than just the initial given. I can, and will explain my thoughts if more information is given.
 
Posts
415
Likes
1,086
Had a laugh at the replies towards the top. I’m not an expert but I’ve seen a few of these and to me the numbering in the seconds ring looks off (3s & 4s especially). And more generally speaking, appropriately aged hands on a flawless dial screams redial/replacement dial to me. It is rather nicely done though.
 
Posts
1,022
Likes
6,136
Imma vote redial. That railroad seems to be a running theme in redials--it really wasn't all that common in watches from the period, but it seems nearly ubiquitous in retreads.

Also, even beyond the spotless condition of the dial, which is very suspicious on its own, why is there be lume on the batons and none at all on the dial numerals or elsewhere?
v62r7v6eliq31.jpg
Edited:
 
Posts
90
Likes
260
Sometimes this forum has a weird sense of humor, thank you all for the feedback.