CajunTiger
路Great! Thank you! I love it here 馃榿
If hands have been relumed than it was nicely done. Geiger shows - according to seller - also the right signs.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Great! Thank you! I love it here 馃榿
If hands have been relumed than it was nicely done. Geiger shows - according to seller - also the right signs.
Its a beauty...the dial condition is very typical as the lume crumbles and sits on the dial burning the finish.
and another one on the original band......
in the OP watch the Amag inner movement holder ring and the Amag. inner cover are re-manufactured. no longer Amagnetic now. many have rusted away and with his dial it shows, this Railmaster had seen some moisture in the past........ kind regards. achim
Dial condition like this is, IMO, only really typical on antimagnetic watches with iron dials, which makes me believe it has to do with the easily corroding dial material reacting to moisture. My own Certina DS amagnetic suffers the same patination and there isn't any lume loss.
Nothing better than a 2914 Railmaster thread however.....
I think the Cailber 284 movement is too early for the OP 2914-6 and would be more correct in a 2914-1 thru 4.
2914-5 (PAF Seamaster) and 2914-6 are generally seeen with a Caliber 285.
Railmaster 135.004-63 use Caliber 286.
Just sayin.....
Nothing better than a 2914 Railmaster thread however.....
I think the Cailber 284 movement is too early for the OP 2914-6 and would be more correct in a 2914-1 thru 4.
2914-5 (PAF Seamaster) and 2914-6 are generally seeen with a Caliber 285.
Railmaster 135.004-63 use Caliber 286.
Just sayin.....
Thanks for the Insight: why is it Not anti-magnetic anymore? Wrong material used?
didn't notice this...but you are correct. 1958 is too early for a -6
It's 169xxx which is really close to 17xxx (1959) which would be 285 - I think it could well be that this is okay.
But i am getting into an experts discussion here and been reduced to the OP 馃檮
I can tell you that your movement number predates 2914-4 numbers
+1 to this. 16.9xx.xxx serial is more into 1959 production than 1958 IMHO hence rather Cal 285. The OP might want to get a confirmed Extract. Most 2914 archives are available.
no doubt that is a major factor in both, the hands look relumed to me as well....which is far more common on these early Railmasters. But of course we are looking at low res photos, impossible to tell for sure unless its in your hands. But based on the overall condition I would say the odds are very high...especially considering how perfect they look...but of course thats just my .02. Overall its a beautiful watch and worth the effort to spend a few years searching for the original parts. Patience is key.
Its a beauty...the dial condition is very typical as the lume crumbles and sits on the dial burning the finish. I would assume the hands were relumed...but those hands are quite uncommon, ive only seen two others with the larger lume hour hand. Here are mine, 2914-2 and 2914-4
Congrats on this, how long did you hunt this baby down? So cool!