I created a cal.
1040 dial encyclopedia to help myself sort through anomalies like this. Link is to a safe google drive hosted pdf. Feel free to download or just refer to the link for web viewing.
Anyway, short answer is that yes that second dial is more appropriate or expected for ref. 176.007, but the first dial is seen on 007 (and 176.005 for that matter) often enough that it may have been an original option. Could have been installed as a service dial at some point as well.
Click to expand...