Forums Latest Members
  1. default Mar 20, 2018

    Posts
    122
    Likes
    64
    seller asked me to remove pictures as I ended up not taking the watch
     
    Edited Mar 21, 2018
    Baz9614 likes this.
  2. ClarendonVintage Mar 20, 2018

    Posts
    702
    Likes
    713
    Yup, looks good.
     
  3. ndgal Mar 20, 2018

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    Looks good.
     
    Edited Mar 20, 2018
  4. Baz9614 Mar 20, 2018

    Posts
    2,073
    Likes
    23,219
    While I’d like to see a higher resolution pic, from what I can see I’ll add a +1 to the above
     
  5. Dgercp Mar 20, 2018

    Posts
    1,072
    Likes
    1,454
    Looks like a correct 1966 with correct type C bezel and very nice.
    Is there something about it that concerns you?
     
  6. omegastar Mar 21, 2018

    Posts
    1,836
    Likes
    5,323
    It might have been relumed. The big triangle is quite large on the right side.
    Better pics are necessary for assessment.
    E74148A4-E4FF-4B81-ADE7-3F32C47B6971.jpeg
     
  7. default Mar 21, 2018

    Posts
    122
    Likes
    64
    edited as above
     
    Edited Mar 21, 2018
  8. Baz9614 Mar 21, 2018

    Posts
    2,073
    Likes
    23,219
    This pic appears to show the correct pinhole found in some original dials?
     
  9. omegastar Mar 21, 2018

    Posts
    1,836
    Likes
    5,323
    Looks ok, no ?
    No pinhole to me.
     
  10. Baz9614 Mar 21, 2018

    Posts
    2,073
    Likes
    23,219
    Not all had a pinhole, it seems later dials did not have them. The close up pic you’ve provided is a little blurry, but the dial in previous pic (non close up) looks good to me from what I can see