Forums Latest Members
  1. watch3s Aug 5, 2017

    Posts
    1,363
    Likes
    821
  2. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Aug 5, 2017

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    Did you read the listing? I think the answer is there.
     
    gemini4 and watch3s like this.
  3. watch3s Aug 5, 2017

    Posts
    1,363
    Likes
    821
    i grow skeptical sometimes, it seems like a deal seeing as how other similar pieces do go for a bit more. i suppose im surprised? that no one snapped it up fast even with the price drop. id be all for it if it wasnt for my pending rolex deal
     
  4. No.15 Aug 5, 2017

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    1,295
    Seems similar to the watchco clones that are on this forum often for a similar price (after the drop)
    Am I missing something? I am still a n00b
     
    watch3s likes this.
  5. watch3s Aug 5, 2017

    Posts
    1,363
    Likes
    821
    same, ive been on a real rolex kick since i intensified my hunt for a gmt
     
  6. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Aug 5, 2017

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    [​IMG]
     
    Baz9614, watch3s and gemini4 like this.
  7. demchocholips Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    226
    Likes
    619
    The pricing is not out of line for a watchco style sm300. Watchco is a company in Australia that took new service parts to assemble sm300 watches around vintage movements. Any similar assemblage of parts to make a sm300 is referred to as a watchco.
     
    Mark020 likes this.
  8. Nobel Prize Spell Master! Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    6,832
    Likes
    13,409
    But it is not a Vintage watch
     
    lando, marco, Cad290 and 2 others like this.
  9. Damo Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    377
    Likes
    2,949
    'New' vintage and in the 1st line 'rebuild' which is definitely not vintage.
     
    watch3s likes this.
  10. wsfarrell Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    2,440
    Likes
    4,132
    You'd think someone with 2,000 posts would know what they're doing with regard to pricing. A 20% price drop in one week suggests they don't. Either that, or they were just being greedy.
     
    watch3s likes this.
  11. No.15 Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    1,295
    I think they were trying to catch someone unaware or inexperienced. WTF is new vintage? Very misleading.
     
  12. Edward53 Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    Nothing looks to be wrong with that watch, new vintage means it is a new build of a vintage watch. Most potential buyers will know exactly what he's talking about. Cheap at that price and I'm surprised it's still there. Maybe the lack of a movement photo is making it stick.
     
    watch3s likes this.
  13. watch3s Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    1,363
    Likes
    821
    agreed, i remember watching the videos on this from several of the popular channels, and back then this was a possible watch under consideration (not this one in particular, but a vintage seamaster 300) i was just surprised by the pricing drop and that its still there. its quite possible seller's phrasing is throwing folks off.
     
  14. watch3s Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    1,363
    Likes
    821
    same here, and if i didnt just settle a trade deal for a gmt master 2, id be all over this. cause they usually dont go that low. maybe hoping for quick funding
     
  15. zerocool Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    36
    Likes
    28
    I believe "rebuild" is going to put a lot of people off, it certainly did to me.
     
    No.15 likes this.
  16. No.15 Aug 6, 2017

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    1,295
    That is part of my problem as well. I think its the phrasing, its a new vintage rebuild. Plus I learned here "rebuild" with no paperwork = not rebuilt. Not really trying to bang the guy or his watch as I really don't know him or his rep. Its just how its coming off to me and I am usually in the bell curve.
     
  17. MaiLollo Aug 7, 2017

    Posts
    1,560
    Likes
    4,331
    I don't believe it's a bargain, I've sold a real WatchCo beginning of 2017 for 2100€ (of course, I'd bought it a bit cheaper than that from a dealer that was closing shop, I always wanted one).
    Maybe it was a bit underpriced, but to be honest there's no reason to pay over what WatchCo sold them originally for (and I've read somewhere that they still hold stock?)
     
  18. padders Oooo subtitles! Aug 7, 2017

    Posts
    8,982
    Likes
    13,922
    Nothing wrong with that listing, would want to check it has a 552 inside though and not some other random movement. Since Watchco now charge circa $2750-3000 head only when they ebay them I would say this one on a bracelet is indeed very cheap, especially from my POV since it is already in the UK so won't get stung for VAT like a Watchco would. It doesn't matter anyway as I just mailed him and it is already gone.
     
  19. OWa Aug 7, 2017

    Posts
    332
    Likes
    777
  20. No.15 Aug 7, 2017

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    1,295