- Posts
- 4
- Likes
- 1
EricB
·Hello everyone,
I inherited this Speedmaster from my father and I'm trying to understand its history before considering a restoration.
Any expert input would be greatly appreciated.
KNOWN HISTORY:
1. Can you confirm the movement is indeed a cal. 861 from the photos?
2. Is the dial confirmed as a Mark II service dial, or could it be something else?
3. Are the hands period-correct service replacements, or later still?
4. Any guess on when this service intervention took place?
5. For someone who wants to bring the watch closer to its original configuration, what would be your advice - leave as-is (honest service watch), or hunt for correct parts (cal. 321, correct 145.012 dial, hands)? Photos attached.
Happy to take more if needed (specific angles, macro shots, etc.).
Thank you for your time and expertise !!
I inherited this Speedmaster from my father and I'm trying to understand its history before considering a restoration.
Any expert input would be greatly appreciated.
KNOWN HISTORY:
- My father bought it during his military service in Germany, most likely 1968-1969, at the latest very early 1970.
- He had it serviced at some point (date unknown) but I have no service records.
- It has been sitting unused for many years.
- Caseback: 145.012-67 SP, HF hallmark
- Movement: serial 32857543, signed Omega Swiss, 17 jewels
- Dial: OMEGA / Speedmaster / PROFESSIONAL / MARK II, T SWISS MADE T at the bottom
- Hands appear to have tritium lume aged to beige/honey
- Case is original 145.012-67 SP, consistent with a 1968 delivery date.
- Movement serial ~32.8M points to ~1970-1971, suggesting this is NOT the original cal. 321 but a replacement cal. 861 installed during a later service.
- "MARK II" on the dial is not standard for a 145.012 - it looks like a service dial from a 145.014 Speedmaster Mark II was installed at some point.
- Hands likely also replaced during the same service ?
1. Can you confirm the movement is indeed a cal. 861 from the photos?
2. Is the dial confirmed as a Mark II service dial, or could it be something else?
3. Are the hands period-correct service replacements, or later still?
4. Any guess on when this service intervention took place?
5. For someone who wants to bring the watch closer to its original configuration, what would be your advice - leave as-is (honest service watch), or hunt for correct parts (cal. 321, correct 145.012 dial, hands)? Photos attached.
Happy to take more if needed (specific angles, macro shots, etc.).
Thank you for your time and expertise !!