Post your Seamaster 300 Ref. 2913 & 14755

Posts

5,856

Likes

16,758

gemini4

·Jun 1, 2021·Hoarder Of Speed et alia

Patrik83

Lovely, Our of curiosity, are these are original to the watch? And is that seconds hand a bit short?

I believe they are original. Here is a link to an auction with a 2913 with slightly different Dauphine’s but the same center seconds hand.

https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/omega-lot-243-37

 

Posts

2,203

Likes

32,495

bristnj

·Sep 24, 2021

Is there a more beautifully designed Omega diver! - 1963 Omega Seamaster 300, Ref. 14755-62, cal. 552 - Delivered to the U.S. Navy Exchanges Base.

 

Posts

394

Likes

535

Mr.Bliss

·Sep 24, 2021

I'd love to share pictures of my Seamaster 300 but I can't seem to find a nice one .
Lucky bas..ds 😀

 

Posts

2,154

Likes

15,435

hejsam

·May 23, 2023

Sorry for digging up an old thread even though a thread with content this good should be highlighted, but I could not find one for the 165.024 SM300.

Enjoying mine today and really love how well it sits on the wrist, such a sexy profile 😀

 

Posts

7,375

Likes

34,094

cristos71

·May 23, 2023

2 x 2913 and 1 x 14755

 

Posts

39

Likes

50

brack

·Aug 10, 2023

Got this 300 165.014 recently, it's joined some relatives

 

Posts

6,589

Likes

11,270

MSNWatch

·Aug 10, 2023·Vintage Omega Aficionado

My 2 cents - these two models with intact original bezels and nice dials are IMO vastly undervalued . They should be a strong second in valuation to the subs from that era. They are probably more uncommon than the comparable subs especially with the fragility of these bezels.

Edited: Aug 10, 2023

 

Posts

47

Likes

101

stokey7873

·Aug 10, 2023

Do you mean undervalued? With how less common these are and their pedigree, I would think they should be valued closer to a sub from the same period. I’d like to say more valuable, but the crown always has an edge up

 

Posts

6,589

Likes

11,270

MSNWatch

·Aug 10, 2023·Vintage Omega Aficionado

stokey7873

Do you mean undervalued? With how less common these are and their pedigree, I would think they should be valued closer to a sub from the same period. I’d like to say more valuable, but the crown always has an edge up

Yes corrected the post.

 

Posts

47

Likes

101

stokey7873

·May 9, 2024

These still seem to be pretty soft in the market. I just picked up a 2913-6 that needs a little work but dial and hands match but lollipop is likely not original to the watch and was relumed. Love the look with both BA and lollipop tho.