Forums Latest Members
  1. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    5,200
    Likes
    23,004
     
  2. Pahawi Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    1,152
    Likes
    3,361
    :thumbsup:

    Think I need one of these GC's....
     
  3. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    7,384
    Likes
    24,199
    Surprisingly high!
     
  4. Vintagewtchzilla Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    946
    Likes
    2,029
    A little wrong usage as it makes 10 counting cycles and then presents the results.

    Values measured are on the low side. One sm300 of a friend shoots up to 37 and i use exactly same counter
     
    Etp095 likes this.
  5. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    7,384
    Likes
    24,199
    10? There will be very little change after three or four cycles. And 17/19 are not "low" readings.

    I am not suggesting that they are dangerous, but plenty of radium watches test in the single digits.
     
  6. Vintagewtchzilla Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    946
    Likes
    2,029
    i don't argue how to use it correctly

    as shown it doesn't make sense from 2nd watch on as u have to start a new cycle for every watch .... period

    i can only tell what i measured over time and a 2998 foll radium dial and hands shouls have at least 17 ....
     
  7. stefman Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    384
    Likes
    686
    Those Speedys are “hot” :)
     
    Etp095 likes this.
  8. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    5,200
    Likes
    23,004

    Relax.

    It’s not intended as a serious test for peer review.

    Just a bit of fun for those unfamiliar with Geiger’s and Speedmasters.

    A full test as you rightly point out would have a different methodology and results
     
  9. Vintagewtchzilla Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    946
    Likes
    2,029
    Just for fun

    9328600D-C766-4E18-894C-3ED26AB7F22D.jpeg

    Even without bezel

    2ADAB840-CD05-4688-A080-7CF23B15E2B0.jpeg


    I hope this counts
     
    Edited Feb 28, 2019
    Etp095, Cuttysark and Spacefruit like this.
  10. jimmyd13 Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    3,148
    Likes
    7,139
    Did I just get cancer watching this?
     
    Edward53, BatDad, Spacefruit and 3 others like this.
  11. Vintagewtchzilla Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    946
    Likes
    2,029
    noooo but i have a "bright" future :p

     
    watchyouwant and jimmyd13 like this.
  12. nonuffinkbloke #1 Nigel Mansell Fan Feb 28, 2019

    Posts
    2,145
    Likes
    5,379
    Don't worry mate! You'll have to go some to catch up with Marie Curie. I had more than that on a CT 'knob and bollock' scan last year. :eek:
     
    Edited Feb 28, 2019
  13. 321Only Jun 9, 2019

    Posts
    409
    Likes
    558
    Was looking for a Geiger Counter the other day. Looks like this Soeks model is recommended?
     
  14. Steve1haggart Jun 9, 2019

    Posts
    986
    Likes
    1,177
    that makes too of us i was looking at this exact model yesterday on flee bay . :)
     
  15. 321Only Jun 9, 2019

    Posts
    409
    Likes
    558
    Definitely need one to check if the lume on my 2998 dial and hands is original
     
  16. padders Oooo subtitles! Jun 9, 2019

    Posts
    8,982
    Likes
    13,922
    Did they find said junk?
     
    eugeneandresson likes this.
  17. nonuffinkbloke #1 Nigel Mansell Fan Jun 9, 2019

    Posts
    2,145
    Likes
    5,379
    Well thank you for asking @padders.::shy:: It could have been very bad.:eek:.... but the good news is, I've been fortunate enough to hang on to all 3 items of "junk".... relatively unscathed. :)
     
    BatDad and padders like this.
  18. Patrik83 Jun 11, 2019

    Posts
    316
    Likes
    275
    What would be the values on the back of the watches?

    Found the following when looking at what levels this corresponds too: So at the moment it is equal to a CT scan. But I guess a watch would be more as it is exposure over time, if you would have the watch with the crystal towards you. So what are the readings on the back of a watch? It should be much less as the alfa radiation is not good at going through things.

    Event, Radiation reading, millisievert (mSv)

    Single dose, fatal within weeks 10,000.00
    Typical dosage recorded in those Chernobyl workers who died within a month 6,000.00
    Single does which would kill half of those exposed to it within a month 5,000.00
    Single dosage which would cause radiation sickness, including nausea, lower white blood cell count. Not fatal 1,000.00
    Accumulated dosage estimated to cause a fatal cancer many years later in 5% of people 1,000.00
    Max radiation levels recorded at Fukushima plant yesterday, per hour 400.00
    Exposure of Chernobyl residents who were relocated after the blast in 1986 350.00
    Recommended limit for radiation workers every five years 100.00
    Lowest annual dose at which any increase in cancer is clearly evident 100.00
    CT scan: heart 16.00
    CT scan: abdomen & pelvis 15.00
    Dose in full-body CT scan 10.00
    Airline crew flying New York to Tokyo polar route, annual exposure 9.00
    Natural radiation we're all exposed to, per year 2.00
    CT scan: head 2.00
    Spine x-ray 1.50
    Radiation per hour detected at Fukushimia site, 12 March 1.02
    Mammogram breast x-ray 0.40
    Chest x-ray 0.10
    Dental x-ray 0.01

    SOURCES: WNA, REUTERS, RADIOLOGYINFO.ORG listed on:
    https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/mar/15/radiation-exposure-levels-guide#data
     
    Edited Jun 11, 2019
    superfly, jimmyd13, Linzer and 4 others like this.
  19. padders Oooo subtitles! Jun 11, 2019

    Posts
    8,982
    Likes
    13,922
    Interesting stats. Bearing in mind that alpha radiation isn't very penetrative due to the relatively large size of the particle (ionised He nucleus) vs beta (electron) and gamma (EMR), I would expect the values experienced by the wrist in wear to be orders of magnitude lower than that measured at the crystal, if indeed measurable at all. As discussed in another recent thread, alpha can be attenuated by sheets of paper, the thickness of dial, movement and caseback should be enough to stop virtually all of it. Maybe someone with a GC could check this? In addition, alpha emitters are much less dangerous if encountered by bare skin than if ingested or inhaled for a similar reason. Of course if lume dust were able to exit the case, for instance in a non hermetic dress watch with a crumbling dial, that would be a different story.

     
    Edited Jun 11, 2019
  20. micampe Jun 11, 2019

    Posts
    1,626
    Likes
    6,171
    Note that many Geiger counters and dosimeters (including the Soeks shown in this thread and the Radex I own) don’t detect alpha radiation at all. And even those that can often are unable to distinguish between alpha, beta, or gamma particles.

    Since these instruments are used to measure radiation doses and rates, not the damage caused by someone ingesting an alpha emitter, the extremely short life and penetration power of alpha particles makes them irrelevant, and therefore also irrelevant when handling a non-disassembled watch, not to mention stopped by the plastic case of the instrument before they can reach the detector tube at all.

    That said, my 2914-3 Railmaster measures 28uSv/h from the front and 2uSv/h from the back.
     
    Edited Jun 11, 2019