Forums Latest Members
  1. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,686
    Hi y'all,

    I have this 145.012-67 that according to the extract has a production date of May 20th 1968. It's on a period correct 1116 bracelet which I believe is original to this particular watch.

    I just so happen to prefer the look of a flat link bracelet. Yesterday I managed to obtain a beautiful tight & fully linked 1039 bracelet, which is stamped 1/69.

    My question: can a 1/69 stamped bracelet be considered period correct for a May 20th 1968 built watch? Or does the bracelet dating usually pre-date the watch?

    IMG_0464.JPG IMG_0455.JPG IMG_0432.JPG
     
  2. watchlovr Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    I'd be delighted with the combo personally.
    I see no issue.
    Lovely watch btw
     
    BartH likes this.
  3. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,686
    Oh yeah, I'm pretty stoked with the combo :)

    I just like to ponder these questions
     
  4. watchlovr Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    It is what we do, you will not be able to stop.

    It gets worse when you search for just the right vintage 18mm NATO for your milsub, a new NATO I hear you ask?
    Wash your mouth out with soap!
    IMG_2950.jpg
     
  5. Davidt Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    10,410
    Likes
    18,105
    Yes the bracelet is often later than the watch head.

    My original, one owner Ed White has an extract stating production in Oct '67, with bracelet stamped 2nd quarter '68.
     
    BartH likes this.
  6. The_Walrus Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    389
    Likes
    354
    A 69 bracelet on a 68 watch head is perfectly acceptable in my book

    Good catch by the way
     
    Mark020 and BartH like this.
  7. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,686
    Thanks boys, now I'm double stoked!
     
  8. nonuffinkbloke #1 Nigel Mansell Fan Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    2,145
    Likes
    5,379
    They are a really lovely looking watch and bracelet combination. :thumbsup:
     
    PhilN likes this.
  9. bokbok Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    217
    Likes
    94
    Looks nicer on the 1039 good job
     
  10. Sculler22 Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    274
    Likes
    179
    They both look great to me.
     
  11. Dero13 4 watches. All set to the wrong time. Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    1,603
    Likes
    6,451
    Lets see a head shot of it with the new bracelet :thumbsup:
     
    oddboy likes this.
  12. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Close enough! Bracelet looks good.

    Let's see the watch!
     
  13. g-boac Apr 1, 2017

    Posts
    433
    Likes
    381
    Absolutely. The two Ω321s I have are both on 1039 bracelet, and the bracelet is later than the caseback date; a 67 bracelet for a -66CB, and a 68 bracelet for a 145.012-67. You are 100% good, and nice find.
     
    The_Walrus likes this.
  14. td69 Apr 2, 2017

    Posts
    441
    Likes
    434
    The combo looks fantastic. Flat links all the way.
     
  15. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Apr 2, 2017

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,686
    Can't show the watch right now, I've dropped it off for a movement service.

    In 4-6 weeks I'll update this thread and show off the watch in all its splendor. :cool:
     
    timestamp and JohnSteed like this.