Forums Latest Members
  1. Schoffenhausen May 29, 2018

    Posts
    102
    Likes
    340
    Hi to all,

    Altough this Connie C (a 168.027) is clearly out of MOY, is it possible that it could be a redial? Or is it a 564 legit out of MOY from the late 60's?

    Thanks in advance,

    Schoffenhausen
     
    IMG-20180529-WA0005.jpg IMG-20180529-WA0017.jpg IMG-20180529-WA0016.jpg IMG-20180529-WA0015.jpg
    llvhhui likes this.
  2. 89-0 May 29, 2018

    Posts
    642
    Likes
    1,928
    You know what's interesting....Ahi tuna is rich in Omega 3s.
     
    llvhhui and ulackfocus like this.
  3. ulackfocus May 29, 2018

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    That looks fine to me. It's a mid- to late-60's model and is probably one of the exceptions to the MOY principle.
     
  4. llvhhui May 29, 2018

    Posts
    724
    Likes
    840
    and ahi poke is delicious.
     
    89-0 likes this.
  5. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member May 29, 2018

    Posts
    12,204
    Likes
    15,717
    "MOY" doesn't necessarily apply to every single Constellation dial.

    What I would suggest is to get the case reference number from the inside of the caseback (let a qualified watchmaker open the watch for you) and compare the fonts of the printing to other watches with the same dial color. Steel grey with white or yellow gold indices is a known dial color for this watch.

    Like the squirrel above says, it looks OK to me.
    gatorcpa
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.
  6. ulackfocus May 29, 2018

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    168.027

    Digit 5 in that reference number was a 1 for a regular bezel or a 2 for a knurled / serrated bezel.
    Digit 6 in that reference number was a 7 for date or a 9 for day / date.