Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
About 60% of the calories in eggs are from fat—much of which is saturated fat. Eggs are also loaded with cholesterol—about 200 milligrams for an average-sized egg. That’s more than double the amount in a Big Mac. Fat and cholesterol both contribute to heart disease.
Everyone should remove eggs from their diet. You're welcome.
Thanks for the message, genuinely.
There was zero intention of misogyny or racism, I was merely pointing out the foolish marketing expenditures and policy. These were facts. I hope that clears things up.
EDIT: I try to think for myself, I make my own opinions. I am not repeating anything here. I supported Biden, I support Trump. I want the best for my country.
It is a form of it, yes.
Ordered populism rests on the belief in a corrupt elite, and the idea that power needs to be wrested from this elite and returned to the people. Oriented toward authoritarianism, ordered populism emphasizes obedience, hostility toward outgroups, a desire to turn back the clock to a time of greater order in society, and a search for a strongman type to lead the return to a better time.
Nothing about ordered populism serves the public interest. Instead, its anti-democratic nature makes it incapable of solving the problems that spawned its rise in the first place. Ordered populism is xenophobic, mistrustful of science and journalism, and unsympathetic to equality and gender issues. Arising out of fear and anger, ordered populism is ultimately unhealthy for Western democracies and their societies and economies.
What is a Big Mac ? The Obese Enabler ? But, somebody has to buy and EAT them ...
Strongman ? Past : Adolf . Stalin .
Present: Putin. And many Mini Strongmen like Kim Il and others .... Weak Strongman : The foreign Asset in the Snowy House.
Gov Whitmer was just at that Snowy White House, praising the tariffs. Televised too, so the geriatric limousine liberals (msm only viewers lol) could watch. Imagine, one of the more progressive Dems doing such a thing.
Not sure I would say "praising" exactly...
"And though Whitmer criticized Trump’s sweeping, rollercoaster rollout of - and subsequent retreat from - tariffs, she said she was not against tariffs “outright” and expressed understanding of Trump’s “motivation” behind deploying them."
I think most people do have a lot in common, but that doesn't mean that "small" differences can't cause massive issues in communication. Regardless of what you have in common, how do you communicate with someone that makes statements that they refuse to back up with reasonable data, and meanwhile rejects any data that they don't agree with? When they choose to reject definitions and supplement their own definitions to back their positions? That's a tough one. An acceptable standard of intellectual honesty should be a cornerstone of society, not something that only a portion of people practice. It's only one minor difference, and yet drops a wall between groups of people trying to communicate or share ideas.
To Archer's point about ordered populism- which is essentially socially organized behind "new world order" type conspiracy theories that perhaps were the foundation for things like QAnon and infowars- would we even be here today if the United States (and to some degree, the entire world) had a standard for how much intellectual dishonesty was too much?