Forums Latest Members
  1. MKelley Nov 10, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
  2. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    26,946
    Likes
    32,631
    I don't love it, its not a particularly special model, just a manual wind dress watch.
     
  3. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    Good, I thought the same, but didn't want to say!
     
  4. MKelley Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
    Thanks, I appreciate your input:)
     
  5. MKelley Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
    No problem, all opinions are welcomed. That's how we learn. I'm not interested in buying it. I just posted as a FYI.:D What I didn't know, but surmise is that there is little or no interest in manual winds.
     
  6. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    4,417
    Likes
    11,222
    Well it's a nice clean example, but I definitely prefer the handwind Geneves from the 60s with the 26X calibers.;)
     
  7. MKelley Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
    This one has a 26X caliber. What is that you prefer about the Geneve vs Century? I really am still learning, so this would be helpful to me and I'm sure others.
     
  8. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    I like the concept of manual - makes the watch thinner, which I like.

    I think it would be useful to know if people are posting with an eye to buy, or just to discuss. Helps others know if they can/should pursue.
     
  9. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    4,417
    Likes
    11,222
    I just prefer the dial layout. The Geneve script that was used on these is one of the nicest scripts IMO. :) They also come in gold.

    [​IMG]
     
  10. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    26,946
    Likes
    32,631
    Its not an established model line piece, and its not a chronometer, and its not an automatic which takes some of the shine off and puts it in the not really collected category. It is a thin dress watch with a simple gold case, but that's about all it has going for it, so compared to a Geneve, Seamaster, Constellation or even early chronometer it just falls a little flat. Nothing wrong with it, just no selling point that jumps out at you.

    Consider a 2799 Constellation De Luxe like Dennis'
    • Its a bumper automatic, something rather uncommon and not seen these days
    • Its a chronometer
    • Its part of a famous model line (constellation)
    • It has a stunningly designed dial
    • Its known and collectable
    So it has a lot of things to like about it aside from it being solid gold.
     
  11. MKelley Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
    That's a good suggestion.:thumbsup: In this thread, I posted the above Ebay find in case others may have missed it. I'm not interested in buying at the moment. I'm still evaluating which ones I might let go. It looks like a nice clean caliber 2XX.
     
  12. MKelley Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
    It is nice looking. Now I see why you like the Geneve.
     
  13. MKelley Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109

    I follow that and agree with your evaluation. I learned just a litle more.Thanks.
     
  14. Gavin It's the quiet ones you have to 'watch' out for. Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    2,399
    Likes
    4,466
    I am in the hunt for one too. And I also prefer it over the Century.
     
  15. ulackfocus Nov 11, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    Got a couple Genèves myself. Frequently wear the 1960 reference 14.703 caliber 562 with the cross hair dial, and am restoring a manual wind reference 2748 caliber 267.
     
  16. MKelley Nov 12, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
    Best of luck to ya, in your hunt.
     
  17. MKelley Nov 12, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
    Excellent. Would like to see it when you're finished:)
     
  18. ulackfocus Nov 12, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    I can show you it (in parts) now. Bought this 36 mm watch with a horrid redial:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    Just bought this correct 31.6 mm dial for it:

    [​IMG]


    Dumb lucked into the watch for a decent price. The regular versions are 34 mm, this reference is one of the very few 36 mm cases. Had to make sure the dial was the correct size because the smaller watches take a dial just under 30 mm.
     
  19. MKelley Nov 12, 2012

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
    Very cool project. I don't have the expertise nor talent to even imagine doing such a task. You are, as well as I'm sure others on the forum are, true watch aficionados to undetake putting together, what I'm sure will be a fine timepiece.:thumbsup:
     
  20. ulackfocus Nov 12, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    Actually, a few of us had to talk about this before I had the watch in hand. Most of us thought the smaller dial worked for both, using just a larger crystal retaining ring. Turns out that would have been a mistake after Steve / N2FHL measured the dial with his trusty digital calipers. Went and bought the 4" calipers a day later for myself.