Forums Latest Members
  1. wwhntr Aug 14, 2013

    Posts
    542
    Likes
    365
    Please give me your critical input on SECOND dial pictured for a ref 2852. (Had no choice but to refinish...see before and after pictures)
    Third picture with silver arrowheads was used by dial refinisher for reference.
    Omega 2852 seamaster wrong print (2).jpg Omega Constellation Dial.JPG
     
    Omega Constellation dial.jpg
  2. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Aug 14, 2013

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,830
    Not a well done job. Lots wrong - fonts wrong and not well printed, minute has marks not properly aligned and finish on dial is wrong.
     
  3. ulackfocus Aug 14, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,973
    It's not very crisp, and the lettering is unfinished (look at the F's in OFFICIALLY).
     
  4. wwhntr Aug 14, 2013

    Posts
    542
    Likes
    365
    Which refinisher(s) can do a superior job?
     
  5. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Aug 15, 2013

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    It's better than the first photo!
     
  6. Dablitzer Aug 15, 2013

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    +1 I can see that it's a redial, but I've seen worse ones...it always boils down to the text..the thickness/spacing gives it away
     
  7. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 15, 2013

    Posts
    26,970
    Likes
    32,673
    Hoi's mate did some of the most complimented jobs around but I'm guessing he's in Vietnam