Forums Latest Members
  1. Philou Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    478
    Hi everyone,
    I am in contact with a guy who is selling a Seamaster 300 ref 165.024 from 1966 and I am looking for opinions about the watch originality and condition. As far as I know, only the seconds hand is a service part, everything else is supposed to be original and the watch comes with a 1067 bracelet.
    The price asked is just below 10k€ access.jpg
    access(13).jpg
    access(11).jpg
    access(5).jpg access(10).jpg access(8).jpg access(7).jpg access(9).jpg access(3).jpg
     
  2. sdre Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    2,460
    Likes
    7,449
    Hour hand looks pretty beat up.

    Edit:

    I looked again, and actually the bezel (if its a tritium one) looks very good. Dial also looks immaculate except for the darkening portion.

    only concern is the hour hand.
     
  3. cristos71 Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    7,155
    Likes
    32,935
    At €10K I'd at least want even lume. Also check how many stretch links are on that bracelet....doesn't look like many to me
     
    Davidt likes this.
  4. Philou Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    478
    Yep, hands and indices condition is a bit worrying
     
  5. Philou Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    478
    You are right about the lume, condition is pretty sad, too bad.
    No idea about the number of sprunglinks still present, how many are installed by default on this bracelet ?
     
  6. cristos71 Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    7,155
    Likes
    32,935
    New and full length would have originally been 10 stretch links, personally I wouldn't buy one that doesn't have at least 5 or 6 still present.
     
    Davidt likes this.
  7. Philou Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    478
    Thanks for the information about the number of links @cristos71, after a quick visit on the thread about vintage SM300m pictures (wow ! :cool:), I am not going to make an offer to the guy, lume condition is too bad for the price.
     
  8. 77deluxe Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    2,058
    Likes
    4,613
    I would pass at that price. It’s not a terrible example, but it isn’t priced close to its condition.
     
  9. Philou Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    478
    Thanks for you opinion, I am definitely going to pass.
     
  10. Vintagewtchzilla Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    946
    Likes
    2,029
    i would pass

    the dial has no sexappeal
    and the case :thumbsdown: on mine it is wider than the bezel on both sides 3,9 o'clock from a direct topdown view, which is here not the case
    bracelet looks also very outworn

    and as usual , there is always a better one out there:thumbsup:
     
  11. speedamatuer Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    265
    Likes
    783
    But where is it? That's the real question...
     
    OMGRLX and Vintagewtchzilla like this.
  12. siguzzi Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    221
    Likes
    616
    The color of the numbers on the bezel looks pretty bright. On my one they are darker
     
    IMG_20180506_121806.jpg
  13. JanV Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    907
    Likes
    2,467
    Hi.

    If you are interested in a -64 trapezoid no date, I can send you a PM on it. It’s one of my watchmakers who’s selling it.
     
  14. Vintagewtchzilla Sep 8, 2018

    Posts
    946
    Likes
    2,029
    patience is the key ... the watch has to find you not the other way round
     
    murph likes this.
  15. Philou Sep 9, 2018

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    478
    Thanks for you opinions guys, with such an unanimity I told the seller I wasn't interested, the lume on the dial, the hands condition, the colour of the numbers on the insert, definitely too much defaults for such a hefty price !
     
  16. Philou Sep 9, 2018

    Posts
    236
    Likes
    478
    Yes I could be, send me a pm @JanV