One Watch Collection or a Variety

Posts
301
Likes
434
I am the hoarder type. I love getting parts and good deals so I end up with lots of stuff. Lately I have been winding down my collection to a few favorites. I have thought about selling it all so I could have one watch. I wonder if other collectors get the feeling of chasing grail watches like I do. For me, I enjoy the hunt. I don't stay satisfied for long once I buy a grail watch and have my eyes on a new one.

Have you guys settled on your grail watch yet or are you always on the hunt for more?
 
Posts
209
Likes
682
Always hunting! Best watch seems to be the one you don’t have in your wrist yet.

anyway, I really enjoy my watches, and everytime I sell one (rare), I feel depressed for a while.
 
Posts
301
Likes
434
I think I would give up all the buying and selling for a Jacob and Co astronomia. 😀

Edited:
 
Posts
1,061
Likes
1,937
Jaeger Lecoultre Deep Sea Master Compressor would bring me joy...
 
Posts
14,151
Likes
40,754
Timepieces have been around for, well, since the 16th century. The length, breadth, depth, and dimension of watches to collect, tell an interesting story of ingenuity and evolution. To limit one’s collection based on any factor aside from budget, is to ignore a hugely interesting collectible. A watch with a story to tell is (to me), more interesting.
 
Posts
347
Likes
1,075
Always hunting but if I had to settle on just one it’d be a Rolex 1016.
 
Posts
328
Likes
441
After plenty of 1950s and 1960s vintage purchases (Omega, Zenith, Longines, Bulova), I broke down and bought my first Rolex at the new year: a 1995 Sub 14060. I’ve been a “never Rolexer” for years, but there’s no denying it’s a killer watch. It’s been 5 months or so since purchasing it, and I have rarely worn anything else. I know I’m not the first person to suggest the 14060 as a one-watch collection.

PS if I had the disposable scratch for a good example, I would have gotten the 1016 as the comment above mentioned. Unimpeachable design.
 
Posts
69
Likes
97
After plenty of modern Rolex’s am turning to vintage watches as the hunt is more interesting and you learn a lot.

if I had to keep only one watch it would be a PP 5231.....
 
Posts
301
Likes
434
If I settled for a watch that could be dressed up or down it would probably be a PP calatrava. A Rolex Sky Dweller is a nice blend of bling and complications.
 
Posts
2,429
Likes
6,544
One watch collection is an oxymoron.
And a waste of time (pun intended).
😉
 
Posts
9,000
Likes
46,231
Not that I have only one watch, but if I did it would be my 2017 SMPc. It’s really the perfect size at 41mm, not too thick, great 2500D movement, waterproof, date complication, fantastic lume and that beautiful glossy black dial that looks great with everything from jeans and t-shirt to a tux. It’s the ultimate all rounder.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,026
Likes
4,226
I think I would be content with a JLC Geophysic (E168), as it is a 'undercover' rarity that can be worn everyday without much fear of theft. (PP amagnetic ref 3417 would also be great too...)
 
Posts
301
Likes
434
my one watch all around is my avatar

Grand Seiko's have amazing dials and movements. A very underrated watch brand when you compare price/quality. It can also be an undercover daily watch.
 
Posts
707
Likes
3,722
I admire any serious collector that is able to amass a large collection, knowledge, and then focus it down to a few (let alone one) piece, in any field. I am personally not there yet, still holding on to my mantra that watches are not wives, you are could have more than one at a time.
 
Posts
889
Likes
1,284
I don’t think I’m capable of a one watch collection.
My best would be probably two, a chrono and a diver one.
 
Posts
1,372
Likes
1,996
Timepieces have been around for, well, since the 16th century. The length, breadth, depth, and dimension of watches to collect, tell an interesting story of ingenuity and evolution.

Yep

To limit one’s collection based on any factor aside from budget, is to ignore a hugely interesting collectible. A watch with a story to tell is (to me), more interesting.

Ehh...disagree. There are watches I "collect" because they match my interests horlogically and aesthetically and then there are watches I buy just for looks. I'll leave you to figure out which category I'm more willing to sell off and which one has the higher allowable budget.
 
Posts
981
Likes
1,587
I'm trying to limit my collection to just one watch ... of each type: One diver, one tool, one dress/time-only, one dress moonphase, one aviator, one driver. So 6.

But then I'll probably want one vintage and one modern of each, so 12.

And then one automatic and one manual wind of each. So my one-watch collection may eventually have at least 24 pieces.
 
Posts
724
Likes
844
I’m trying to limit mine to the 5 piece watch box. It’s very difficult sometimes.
 
Posts
301
Likes
434
I'm such a hoarder that the thought of selling every single watch except one is haunting. I enjoy the hunt though. If I sold them all to buy one really expensive watch, then I probably wouldn't wear it on a daily basis.