The watch head looks legitimate to me... service crown, mild dial damage with some specks here and there and a bit of wear on the tachy ring at 3 o'clock, proper hands with missing lume in the sweep second paddle, some wear on the case but no evidence of major damage, movement and chrono bridge markings look OK... but the photos haven't improved, so fine details are still difficult to see. The sub dials look pretty good, and the blue one hasn't gone brownish. It would be nice to see (or even have a verbal report of) the case back number. Frequently these numbers are stamped (or worn) quite shallow and very difficult to photograph, but still legible. My question to the seller would be: is there a legible case back number, and if so, what is it? The first four characters would be enough. I don't think the watch is a Franken, but I would want to know whether the case back number is legible mainly for my own (purely personal) valuation purposes. I'm always irked when that number is polished off.
The seller has done a couple of things in the re-listing that might be a bit disingenuous... or a bit of gamesmanship... or purely innocent. 😉
1) He no longer shows the incorrect bracelet clasp that we saw on the prior listing.
2). Though he again shows us the incorrect GF end pieces (ZKM's belong on an angled tonneau case like the A385), the photos of the watch face in the new listing were taken with the watch on a leather band, or with no band. We are no longer able to see that the GF end pieces are ill-fitting on the front.
In sum, I think watch looks OK, bracelet and seller a little sketchy. The bracelet still has value in the $300 range, and I would want to be sure that it is still included in the sale, given the new photos of a black leather strap.