Forums Latest Members
  1. crownretro Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    10
    Likes
    16
    Hi guys,

    examining my Omega 145.012-67, the serial number looks as though it reads either 205401XX or 285401XX-. the second digit is either a 0 or an 8. OR a 0 with a stamping error, that makes it look lika an 8. I always thought it was 8 but someone else questioned it, so now I'm not sure...

    Do you guys know if the serial numbers for the 145.012-67 went into the 28s? Anyway, here's a photo of my Omega and serial number in question, what do you guys think-
     
    SPEEDMASTER 1.jpg SPEEDMASTER 4.jpg SPEEDMASTER 5.jpg SPEEDMASTER 9.jpg SPEEDMASTER 6.jpg SPEEDMASTER 8.jpg
  2. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    crownretro likes this.
  3. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    26,947
    Likes
    32,634
    Looks more like a 6 to me which would be correct for a 145.012
     
    crownretro likes this.
  4. crownretro Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    10
    Likes
    16
    I think you're right, lads. And I'm so wrong. Cheers.
     
  5. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    5,200
    Likes
    23,005
    crownretro likes this.
  6. speedy4ever Moonwatch Only Author Oct 24, 2015

    Posts
    639
    Likes
    782
    I confirm that 20.54 and 28.54 are simply not Speedmasters and that it is 26.540.xxx
     
    crownretro likes this.
  7. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Oct 24, 2015

    Posts
    26,947
    Likes
    32,634
    Very pretty watch btw
     
    crownretro likes this.
  8. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Dec 31, 2016

    Posts
    5,824
    Likes
    10,836
    Looks certainly like 2654 what's correct
    We have seen different tables with Speedmaster serial numbers, so far even that a 1967 (145.012) should be between 2406. and 2700. more precisely between 2544. and 2655.