Forums Latest Members
  1. ilrub Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    0
  2. shaun hk Fairy nuffer Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    1,425
    Likes
    1,516
    I dont think it is fake but I also dont think it left the factory with that dial. I certainly wouldn't buy it and suggest you keep looking. Though I would not describe myself as an expert
     
  3. ilrub Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    0
    Hi, thanks for your opinion, i also think that dial has been changed sometimes.
     
  4. JohnSteed Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    Josef -- this dial doesn't indicate a 321 calibre movement but 861. You need to see photos of the movement to know if the calibre is 321 or not. Seller may intend this is that but uploaded the wrong photos? There's no way of knowing without photos. You can ask seller for photos

    For a 1968 Speedmaster, try searching 145.022 145.012 105.012 105.003 and see what results show. Adding -68 to the end of each search limits the results but is what you say you want.

    You should know as well Chrono24 (and online venues generally) can be a minefield if you're not sure what to look for in a Speedmaster.
     
  5. scook94 Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    115
    Likes
    102
    The listing describes it as a 145.012 - 68 SP, isn't that the cal 321 and the 145.012 - 68 ST being a cal 861? But as you say, only way to be sure is to see an image of the movement.
     
  6. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    Interestingly, the seller states that the dial is original and super rare.
     
    Edited Nov 28, 2014
  7. bill5959 Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    598
    Likes
    361
    The dial doesn't look right for any Speedy. "T Swiss Made T" is crooked as is the 6'oclock lume. I would pass. You will find another if you are patient. Regards. Bill
     
  8. ilrub Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    0
    Hi again, yes it is a bit confused. Seller means the dial is rare because of the printed logo and he also declared that the logos of the cal.861 doesn't fit in the 321 which is the caliber in that watch . he sent me photos : P1200680.JPG P1200681.JPG P1200682.JPG P1200685.JPG
     
  9. pascs Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    1,634
    Likes
    5,657
    Something isnt right about this watch and I'd pass on it. My '67 has a movement number newer than the one shown above so not sure how that one could be a '68.

    The dial from a 861 will fit a 321 and vice versa if you really wanted to. The case also looks pretty worn.
     
  10. bill5959 Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    598
    Likes
    361
    The movement number fits the -68 watch. However the clutch bridge is symmetrical. This indicates that part at least is 1964 or earlier. You have a movement which raises still more questions and still no answers. Regards. Bill
     
    JohnSteed likes this.
  11. JohnSteed Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    Imho ... Pass!!!

    Seems put together as parts look mismatched to my eye. One quick for instance is ...
    image.jpg
    This symmetrical bridge is likely used in earlier Speedmasters, approx 1962-3 and/or earlier, doesn't belong with S/N in the 24 million range (approx 1967 or so)

    I would forget this watch and move on! UNLESS you're parts shopping and this is very cheap (which it seems, isn't).
     
  12. repoman Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    2,248
    Likes
    4,274
    This watch has had a mysterious history... I would pass, mysterious in this case is not a good thing.
     
  13. JohnSteed Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    Well there it is

    ... and this part from pic #1 seems a different colour too. Swapped in part??
    image.jpg

    Now you have a better idea what to look for .... in your next search

    Good luck!!
     
  14. ilrub Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    0
    Hi , yes you're right. That's a mysterious thing. I will let it pass and try to find another one.
    Thanks for your opinions which were very helpful. If i find another one i will post here again.
    Greets, Josef
     
  15. mozambique Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    746
    Likes
    412
    For that year the clutch bridge should look like this (asymmetrical as mentioned above):
    xxx.jpeg
     
  16. mozambique Nov 28, 2014

    Posts
    746
    Likes
    412
    Josef,
    Good luck with your search!
     
  17. ilrub Nov 29, 2014

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    0
    Oh, thanks for that details. Fantastic place with great people here !!
    Now i know a lot more for my next searches !!!
    Thanks, Josef
     
  18. Davidt Nov 29, 2014

    Posts
    10,419
    Likes
    18,125
    Movement issues as above, case is over polished and pretty poor, dial is wrong and the hands look new.

    I'd say at best it's a watch that's been poorly restored and at worse it's a complete Franken.

    Pass. Patience is the name of the game. A good one WILL come up and it will be worth the wait.

    The FS forum here is a safe-ish place to start.

    There was also a nice '68 on eBay a few weeks ago. You can see it in the auctions section here for reference.
     
  19. rote amazone Nov 29, 2014

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    9
    Hi Joseph , now im also here in this forum:), forget this Speedy , its completely unpossible to find a 145012 with painted Logo

    Best regards
    Elmar
     
  20. ilrub Nov 29, 2014

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    0
    Thanks Elmar, the dial was the first part to doubt as a good friend told me to look at. But for the movement you need experts like the people here !!! Thanks to everybody here to save my money , i keep on searching !!!
    greets, josef