- Posts
- 1,344
- Likes
- 1,958
simonsays
·Just to add fuel to the fire on the recent 105.012 with the unusual non pro dial discussed in a previous thread. If you missed it it was a wide T non pro dial in a 105.012-63.
It has long been debated weather or not these watches left the factory like this, or if they were fitted with the wrong dial at a later date.
This dial is not a known example of the 105.003 because the wide T spacing was not used on these dials, so this one is closer to a 105.012 or 145.012 dial, with long indices and before mentioned wide T's.
Members have been forthright in the opinion that Omega would never put a Non Pro dial in an asymmetric case as they go together hand in glove. Well perhaps the evidence that Omega would do this has been in plain sight all along.
The red racing dials with applied logos are all non pro in asymmetric cases, and there are enough of them to confirm that they left the factory in this configuration.
It has long been debated weather or not these watches left the factory like this, or if they were fitted with the wrong dial at a later date.
This dial is not a known example of the 105.003 because the wide T spacing was not used on these dials, so this one is closer to a 105.012 or 145.012 dial, with long indices and before mentioned wide T's.
Members have been forthright in the opinion that Omega would never put a Non Pro dial in an asymmetric case as they go together hand in glove. Well perhaps the evidence that Omega would do this has been in plain sight all along.
The red racing dials with applied logos are all non pro in asymmetric cases, and there are enough of them to confirm that they left the factory in this configuration.
