Omega Speedmaster 2998-3 vs 105.002 Dial ID

Posts
229
Likes
328
Hello everyone. From what I can tell from these not-so-nice photos,
I think it could be a 2998-3 dial or perhaps a 105.002.
Or maybe not oval anymore, a 4 longer than the previous graphics.
Now, my question is: I think the graphics are a little thick.
In that era, I always saw thinner white graphics.
What do you think?

 
Posts
48
Likes
79
They seem a bit thicker compared to the 105.002 that I owned a couple of years ago. This one was from 63. Maybe yours is earlier?

 
Posts
229
Likes
328
Is there any omission, sign, text, or character that could raise red flags about its originality?

 
Posts
229
Likes
328
They seem a bit thicker compared to the 105.002 that I owned a couple of years ago. This one was from 63. Maybe yours is earlier?

ma quanto è bello il tuo orologio!!! 🤩
 
Posts
48
Likes
79
Is there any omission, sign, text, or character that could raise red flags about its originality?

Not to me. Looks fine but ask better opinions
 
Posts
229
Likes
328
Can anyone tell me why some 2998 dials have concentric circular imprints in the compax and others have smooth surfaces?