Forums Latest Members
  1. Speedmasterfan88 Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    1,294
    Likes
    4,358
    GuiltyBoomerang likes this.
  2. GuiltyBoomerang Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    1,727
    Likes
    5,927
    Probably now holds the same value as a new WatchCo manufacture...
     
    Speedmasterfan88 likes this.
  3. Edward53 Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    Some odd things going on there. 166.0324 is a service parts case, so why did that need restoring? Also it's a non-date in the first photo and a date in the others.
    Edited to add: It gets odder. Further down the page the seller says this is a 552 in a 165.024 case.
     
    Edited Sep 21, 2016
    YWK and Speedmasterfan88 like this.
  4. Speedmasterfan88 Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    1,294
    Likes
    4,358

    You're right! I just saw this after waking up, must have slipped through my sleepy vision. There Is something fishy with this listing...
     
  5. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    7,387
    Likes
    24,221
    If I were forced to send a vintage watch to any manufacturer, I would clearly state what would not be acceptable (e.g. case polishing, re-lume, etc.), and reinforce it in writing. Were the manufacturer not to agree to my terms, I would find a work-around.

    Yes, sometimes a hard-to-find part is required. But I would still refuse to do (service) business with a company that makes outrageous demands.
     
    Speedmasterfan88 likes this.
  6. Speedmasterfan88 Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    1,294
    Likes
    4,358
    I would rather buy a watchco "re-edition" one and be happy with what it is, as buying a botched up original wondering what it could've been.
     
    Albe100 likes this.
  7. Edward53 Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    As collectors we know how to look after vintage watches, but sadly others don't.

    I did just that and am very happy with it. I wouldn't dare to wear an original one for fear of spoiling it. And I daren't even THINK about a Speedmaster.
     
    Speedmasterfan88 likes this.
  8. Speedmasterfan88 Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    1,294
    Likes
    4,358
    BTW, I just contacted the seller about the contradicting pictures. Let's see If I get a response.

    Edit: just got an answer. Somehow there was a "mistake" he's selling the date Version.
     
  9. padders Oooo subtitles! Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Looks very dodgy to me. Unless he has 2 restored originals for sale I would suspect that the presence of the contradictory photos suggests a scammer. Date Windows don't disappear and magically reappear. It's probably just a modern rebuild (amateur Watchco) advertised creatively. Or a scam.
     
  10. webvan Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    606
    Likes
    320
    Sorry to go on a tangent, where would good place be to get a wathco "re-edition" ? Thanks !
     
  11. Speedmasterfan88 Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    1,294
    Likes
    4,358
  12. webvan Sep 21, 2016

    Posts
    606
    Likes
    320
    Thanks!
     
    Speedmasterfan88 likes this.