Omega - Seamaster Genève Automatic - 166.002

Posts
4
Likes
2
Good morning, I have bought my first Omega online: https://www.catawiki.com/en/l/56745949-omega-seamaster-geneve-automatico-166-002-men-1960-1969

What do you think? Is the description correct and what would the year of manufacturing?

* Vintage automatic Omega Seamaster watch
* Light dial with applied indices, applied Omega logo, central seconds and date display at 3 o'clock
* The date is set by pulling the crown into the second position.
* Gilt case measuring approx. 34.5 mm in diameter excl. lugs and crown
* Steel screw-down case back with external Seamaster logo and Omega reference numbers on the interior
* Self-winding Omega-made movement, calibre 565

Thanks,
-Hajo
bt5qGyJYhTfvr4vK9
RFtDZYeZ8SdxQSVz5
 
Posts
3,232
Likes
12,696
Hi Hajo,

welcome aboard and my apologies but what’s to follow isnt good news, I’m afraid.

The description doesn’t mention the cosmetic condition whatsoever, but you’ve looked at the pictures so I hope you’re aware of the damaged dial, heavily polished case, incorrect crown.

It does mention a recent service from last month, which is, pardon my French, utter horseshit. There are parts missing from the movement (see the regulator), the one visible movement clamp is rusty and sitting at a weird angle, screws are rusty, the gasket is obviously very, very old and has dried up, which means it won’t serve as waterproofing. There is significant rotor rub visible… That is a very, very sorry and tired looking movement I’m afraid and there’s no chance anything close to a proper service was performed on it last month. Did the seller put a drop of oil on it and regulated it in a quick 5-minute job? Maybe.

If you have any chance to return it I’d recommend you do so. I’m aware it was pretty cheap for vintage omega standards but there is a reason for it.

Don’t let this kill all the motivation and fun in this hobby, though. Many of us have spent significantly more on pretty bad stuff at the beginning…

Oh, and the year of production should be ~1969, judging by the serial.
 
Posts
7,697
Likes
62,095
Have a look at the Private Sales thread on this Forum.
 
Posts
4
Likes
2
MtV MtV
Hi Hajo,

welcome aboard and my apologies but what’s to follow isnt good news, I’m afraid.

The description doesn’t mention the cosmetic condition whatsoever, but you’ve looked at the pictures so I hope you’re aware of the damaged dial, heavily polished case, incorrect crown.

It does mention a recent service from last month, which is, pardon my French, utter horseshit. There are parts missing from the movement (see the regulator), the one visible movement clamp is rusty and sitting at a weird angle, screws are rusty, the gasket is obviously very, very old and has dried up, which means it won’t serve as waterproofing. There is significant rotor rub visible… That is a very, very sorry and tired looking movement I’m afraid and there’s no chance anything close to a proper service was performed on it last month. Did the seller put a drop of oil on it and regulated it in a quick 5-minute job? Maybe.

If you have any chance to return it I’d recommend you do so. I’m aware it was pretty cheap for vintage omega standards but there is a reason for it.

Don’t let this kill all the motivation and fun in this hobby, though. Many of us have spent significantly more on pretty bad stuff at the beginning…

Oh, and the year of production should be ~1969, judging by the serial.

Thanks! I will not continue to buy this watch thanks to your advise!!
 
Posts
16,776
Likes
47,484
Your barred from buying a watch for two months whilst research can be done….