Forums Latest Members
  1. WristScout Jan 3, 2019

    Posts
    19
    Likes
    6
    I’m very curious to find out what you guys think about this particular piece. I can’t seem to find any other examples with this dial and case. Was wondering if anyone has any knowledge on whether this watch is correct or if the dial has been swapped in any way. Inside is the Cal.355
     
    DD9CD27E-B0BA-4C08-87C9-74E4AAA844F7.png C0620269-A352-40C4-9674-841D93ACDA98.png E0A638A0-9A87-4110-9620-83E96DDC0F15.png 22296CD2-4BFF-4104-AAE0-679B49A7DFF3.png
  2. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Jan 3, 2019

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    Your dial is good but it has been repainted with the wrong font.
     
  3. WristScout Jan 4, 2019

    Posts
    19
    Likes
    6
    Are you talking about the seamaster font?
     
  4. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Jan 4, 2019

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    Yes. It is for 60's seamaster.

    Wrong.
    2019-01-04_04-56-25__01.jpg


    Correct .

    2019-01-04_04-57-08.jpg
     
    WristScout likes this.
  5. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Jan 4, 2019

    Posts
    12,591
    Likes
    29,842
    Also missing the luminous at the ends of the daggers, plus the movement is horrible.

    This dial configuration, daggers and Arabic numerals, is a legitimate variation, it's just bee refinished incorrectly.

    Seller has been trying to pass this one off as original for months.

    C0620269-A352-40C4-9674-841D93ACDA98.png
     
    WristScout and dan7800 like this.