This watch is catching my interest. Priced a little high. But clean looks.


https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.com/ulk/itm/292982017869

I'm trying to find out how to understand the older case number for further research.

Dial looks like not original to watch.

Crown is not true.

But the movement seems like low miles.

Any thoughts greatly appreciated.

Cheers!

 

The link may expire, or it might be a phishing trap, so when we go to make judgements, we only respond to photographs.

Well, at least I do.

So pics please.

It's pretty easy to do, just "copy image", select spot in your post and hit "Ctrl V" or "Cmd V".

If you're doing all this on a phone I don't have a clue, I just use mine for talking.

 

Ok thanks. Sorry I am new here.

 

No probs, you'll get the hang of the place.

It only took me a year or so.

 

Posted pics using my smartphone;-)

 

Caseback appears to match case style. Case chamfers look to be polished out.

Dial seconds don't align well with minute indices. Lume is consistent between hands and indices. HMS seems consistent with original. S style should be coat hangar on original dial.

 

Re coathanger. If you are speaking generally for 1950s Seamaster then not necessarily, several styles are seen. If you have specific knowledge of the 2759 or 2761 being all coathanger then fair enough, but I have doubts.

I agree that it is a redial.

 

Yes agreed on both types present for the period. But when I look at this dial style on authentic examples there I see the hangar S. So assume not for this style dial.