Omega Seamaster 166.010-67, need help

Posts
20
Likes
38
hello Omega lovers, I'm looking to this beauty (for me), a crosshair dial Seamaster 166.010-67, 900€, do you think it's ok? could be my next purchase?
thanks for the time you would dedicate to me 😊
 
Posts
3,333
Likes
7,344
These are plentiful, very nice watches. For that price I think you can find one with a better dial this one has some blistering and spotting. I would keep looking- lots in Japan check ebay
 
Posts
24,658
Likes
54,768
I'm finding the spots and blisters to be pretty distracting.
 
Posts
10,582
Likes
16,536
I'm finding the spots and blisters to be pretty distracting.

Keep using the cream. Before long Little Dan will be fine.
 
Posts
99
Likes
99
The lugs look a bit overpolished too. But my eyes aren't what they used to be.

Also, the endlinks appear to be 1mm too small.

Good luck.

Chris
 
Posts
476
Likes
395
I have always been wary of crosshairs that skip the text. Am I right in that thinking, or is there some nuance in understanding crosshairs?
 
Posts
3
Likes
1
hello Omega lovers, I'm looking to this beauty (for me), a crosshair dial Seamaster 166.010-67, 900€, do you think it's ok? could be my next purchase?
thanks for the time you would dedicate to me 😊
So many connoisseurson here moaning about a slight blemish on a 60 year old dial, look, the watch is all fine, crowns original, back, movements been serviced at some point, obviously not a bad example, with original bracelet yea it's fine, if you want an unblemished dial just buy a new watch, blemishes, bubbling scratches are part of that watches history, that's the beauty of vintage