Forums Latest Members
  1. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    Hello Everyone,

    I recently came across this watch on a Polish auction site and could not resist the urge to buy it here It is only after that I started having doubts. It's a 562 werk and the watch has supposedly been made in 1959. It's the part where it says that the case of the watch is "entirely made of stainless steel and 14K gold" that troubles me, it does not say it's gold plated. Also there is no Omega logo on the glass.. Can any of you adivce if the watch is genuine or not and if it's worh 500 Euros? If not, do you think I have ground for returning it?

    Thank you in advance!
     
  2. Hijak Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    I suspect that this might be a redial...the "Omega" printed on the dial looks a little off, especially the "G." Others will chime in with their opinions as well so hang on a bit for more input.
     
    credance likes this.
  3. shaun hk Fairy nuffer Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    1,425
    Likes
    1,516
    I am fairly sure it is not an out and out fake. The crystal (glass) may have been changed and replaced with a non Omega part, changing the crystal is normal and acceptable though an Omega replacement is preferable. The movement looks to be in nice condition, I am not sure if the dial has been repainted or not. Someone will be along soon to confirm one way or the other. The second hand also looks to be a different colour so this may be a replacement and the case does look to have been polished. I have no idea on whether or not the price is reasonable.
     
    credance likes this.
  4. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    Thanks for your input, much appreciated! The more I look at the pictures, the more worried I become..
     
  5. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    As for the hands, the description clearly states "original, golden Dauphine type hands", it can of course be BS, but maybe there's a slight chance that they appear as different coloured because of the light direction?
     
  6. shaun hk Fairy nuffer Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    1,425
    Likes
    1,516
    Yeah, I agree I thought the pictures were very good at making the watch look nice but not great for detail though it may just be my tired old eyes, as well as a lack of knowledge....
     
  7. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    No worries mate, I am not an expert myself, far from it. Otherwise I would not be in the position I am now :) Your input is still appreciated!
     
  8. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    12,620
    Likes
    29,918
    The watch is quite genuine and appears to be in good condition. The dial does appear to have been refinished, as noted by Hijak, the fonts don't look quite right, although its not a bad job.

    Serial number dates to ca 1960 and is correct for the case.

    These are what is called a gold capped case, stainless steel with a heavy layer of solid gold fused to it, much thicker than gold plating.
     
    credance likes this.
  9. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    X350 XJR, thank you for your reply and for lifting my mood a little bit after starting to think more and more that I've been ripped off. Means a lot! Not that this changes anything at the moment, but in your professional opinion, do you think the watch was worth its price?
     
  10. ulackfocus Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    Yep, redial for sure. Owned a few 14.70x Seamasters and Genèves over the years, and that's definitely the wrong fonts.

    What was the price in US $, €, and/or £?
     
  11. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    495 / $681 / £424 respectively
     
  12. ulackfocus Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    I wouldn't say you were ripped off, but you did pay a little bit more than a redial would bring on an open auction. Most of us have done WAY worse if we went on our own for our first vintage Omega purchase.
     
    credance likes this.
  13. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    Thanks, I really thought a LOT before bidding, but apparently I could have figured out that maybe asking somebody who is much more qualified than myself in making an assessment like this beforehand would be a good idea..
     
  14. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    12,620
    Likes
    29,918
    +1

    Really not to bad for a first unassisted purchase.
     
  15. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    Thanks. It's a valuable lesson for me, fortunately not as costly as it could have proven.
     
  16. MKelley Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    1,159
    Likes
    109
    +2 You did far better than I did for a first Omega purchase.
     
    credance likes this.
  17. John R Smith Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    1,320
    Likes
    726
    It's a very posh looking watch. And the pictures are very well taken to show it off to advantage. Believe me, you could have done far, far worse. Will you keep the bracelet, or change it for a leather strap?
     
  18. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    The watch is still not in my possession, I am expecting it to arrive within the next 2-3 days & I have not made up my mind yet. It is supposed to come with an additional leather strap as well and I am not expecting the leather strap to come with an Omega buckle that would for sure look killer with it. I am yet to make up my mind about this, but I am leaning towards leaving the bracelet option, I think it's a good combo!
     
  19. ulackfocus Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    For some reason this sounds like bragging, but it's more embarassment: I think I have the "Dumbest n00b Purchase" category sewn up. At least for somebody who stayed with the hobby. Here's the link inside a thread about first vintage Omegas:

    http://omegaforums.net/threads/post-your-1st-vintage-omega.4040/#post-46633
     
  20. credance Oct 29, 2013

    Posts
    18
    Likes
    2
    Wow, now that's an instant smile-raiser :) I think it would be really hard (but still not impossible) to top that! Because of all of you I already am at least 2 times smarter than I was a few hours ago in regard to Omega watches and for this I want to say thank you. I am definitely not going to get discouraged by my first purchase, might not be 100% what I signed up for, but it just motivates me - as you said it's not a disaster.

    On that note, if any of you guys ever come across an original dial that I could use a replacement to make my Seamaster a bit more complete, I would more than appreciate any tips!!