Willem023
路Hi All,
After having thoroughly enjoyed @ConElPueblo 's thread on crowns ( https://omegaforums.net/threads/the-curious-case-of-controversial-constellation-crowns.54568/ ), and esp. his take on the 'it would be great if we knew more about it' 馃憤,
Why not have an alike discussion on the Omega logo on the dial. Unless there is a lot already written / published about that, in which case I will gladly be corrected.
Anyway: these 2 Seamasters are 6 digits apart at 13,89M. One might call them 'twins' as far as I know.
Which might date them at around 1953.
There is no reason to believe that they have had some kind of redial, looking at the pics.
And: look at the crowns...馃槣馃槣
However: the Omega logo is different.
It appears to be that around '52-'54 the logo changed.
So what to think of this??
BTW: either way, I love them!
馃榾
After having thoroughly enjoyed @ConElPueblo 's thread on crowns ( https://omegaforums.net/threads/the-curious-case-of-controversial-constellation-crowns.54568/ ), and esp. his take on the 'it would be great if we knew more about it' 馃憤,
Why not have an alike discussion on the Omega logo on the dial. Unless there is a lot already written / published about that, in which case I will gladly be corrected.
Anyway: these 2 Seamasters are 6 digits apart at 13,89M. One might call them 'twins' as far as I know.
Which might date them at around 1953.
There is no reason to believe that they have had some kind of redial, looking at the pics.
And: look at the crowns...馃槣馃槣
However: the Omega logo is different.
It appears to be that around '52-'54 the logo changed.
So what to think of this??
BTW: either way, I love them!
馃榾
Edited: