Im sort of new to the omega watch brand and have been jumping between a 38mm aqua terra and De Ville. I dont see that much enthusiasm from omega fans for the De Ville collection as oposed to the AT or Speedmaster. Why? I went to try on both and I really liked the AT, the DV looks beautiful but I feel there is something off. It might be the size but I'm not sure, I like the white dial one the most. Any thoughts?

 

Everyone has their own preferences for watch designs and why you are getting a piece (collecting vs. a one-watch-collection).

I own a vintage De Ville which speaks to the line's history. I believe the AT is a much more modern addition to the Seamaster family. I think most people would agree that the AT is much more versatile and can easily be dressed up or dressed down. I feel like the De Ville looks and feels more formal.