Omega De Ville 166.0033

Posts
5
Likes
1
Hi everyone,

I am new here and new to vintage omega's and I was wondering if you guys could help me out with this watch I am considering.

It's this De Ville De Ville 166.0033 from 1964. The owner is calling the watch gold plated, but the watches I can find online of this reference in gold are all solid gold. Any thoughts on this? (and more general thoughts on the watch) The gold caseback is what is confusing me at the moment.

Thanks for your help!

 
Posts
3,232
Likes
12,694
Hi @mr-oat
gold-plated case-backs on gold-plated watches aren't completely uncommon. You do have the answer right there: The reflections make it hard to read, but doesn't it say 40 micron between the lugs? 😀 That's the thickness of the gold layer.
 
Posts
5
Likes
1
MtV MtV
Hi @mr-oat
gold-plated case-backs on gold-plated watches aren't completely uncommon. You do have the answer right there: The reflections make it hard to read, but doesn't it say 40 micron between the lugs? 😀 That's the thickness of the gold layer.
Alright thank you!! Do you know the value of a piece like this? In what range should I be okay purchasing this watch
 
Posts
3,232
Likes
12,694
M mr-oat
Alright thank you!! Do you know the value of a piece like this? In what range should I be okay purchasing this watch

Don’t just rely on what my feeling is regarding the price, as it’s a model I don’t really follow. Search for “Omega 166.033” on eBay and click “sold articles” to see what they actually sell for. I did find one on C24 from a dealer, asking for 879€. Note that this is a dealer price on a platform that is considerably more expensive anyway - even though the dial he offers isn’t structured and thus possibly a little less sought after than yours. I’d think very roughly ~500€ might be realistic, if the movement is fine. But since these are front-loaders, many private sellers can’t open them. I’d ask for those pictures anyway, would be nice if the seller can provide any.
 
Posts
5
Likes
1
MtV MtV
Don’t just rely on what my feeling is regarding the price, as it’s a model I don’t really follow. Search for “Omega 166.033” on eBay and click “sold articles” to see what they actually sell for. I did find one on C24 from a dealer, asking for 879€. Note that this is a dealer price on a platform that is considerably more expensive anyway - even though the dial he offers isn’t structured and thus possibly a little less sought after than yours. I’d think very roughly ~500€ might be realistic, if the movement is fine. But since these are front-loaders, many private sellers can’t open them. I’d ask for those pictures anyway, would be nice if the seller can provide any.

Okay thank you very much. Movement should be ok as it has been serviced less than a year ago so I'm not that worried about that.

I will take a look on ebay tommorow, thanks for the tip and your opinion!
 
Posts
3,232
Likes
12,694
M mr-oat
Okay thank you very much. Movement should be ok as it has been serviced less than a year ago so I'm not that worried about that!

Unless there’s proof for that - a receipt from a reputable watchmaker that can clearly be connected to this very watch - I’d take this information with a grain of salt.
 
Posts
5
Likes
1
MtV MtV
Unless there’s proof for that - a receipt from a reputable watchmaker that can clearly be connected to this very watch - I’d take this information with a grain of salt.
Yeah he does have a receipt (from the service) from where he bought it, so that's why I said it.
 
Posts
7,676
Likes
61,948
M mr-oat
Yeah he does have a receipt (from the service) from where he bought it, so that's why I said it.

I think the point @MtV is making is that, with a sixty year old watch at the price you’re probably intending to pay, there should be a proper “receipt from a reputable watchmaker that can clearly be connected to this very watch”.

Most vintage watch sellers have in-house repairer of varying degrees of expertise, or use watch repairers, and some of them will be ‘reputable' ie have a reputation for experience and expertise within the used watch trade. Sadly, some will just do the bare minimum, or not be very good. You generally get what you pay for.

So, it’s not just a case of having 'a receipt', it’s knowing who wrote the receipt and what they actually did with the watch your going to spend your money on 😀
 
Posts
5
Likes
1
I think the point @MtV is making is that, with a sixty year old watch at the price you’re probably intending to pay, there should be a proper “receipt from a reputable watchmaker that can clearly be connected to this very watch”.

Most vintage watch sellers have in-house repairer of varying degrees of expertise, or use watch repairers, and some of them will be ‘reputable' ie have a reputation for experience and expertise within the used watch trade. Sadly, some will just do the bare minimum, or not be very good. You generally get what you pay for.

So, it’s not just a case of having 'a receipt', it’s knowing who wrote the receipt and what they actually did with the watch your going to spend your money on 😀
Right, that makes sense thanks. Pretty sure he got it from a 'reputable' seller though. Nevertheless will research it some more now, thanks for the input! 😀