Forums Latest Members
  1. vandesteeg Oct 16, 2019

    Posts
    82
    Likes
    121
    Hi everyone,

    I stumbled across this piece. While at first I thought it was worthless and in very bad condition (i still think it is in very bad condition), I had some time to spare and started doing some research. At first I couldn’t find any early constellations with the 2737 case, just some unnamed omegas. Then I came across a post from Desmond mentioning that he had seen a constellation with this case just once.

    Since omega messed around with the cases, dials and movements in the late 40’s early 50’s I thought that maybe this could be one of those very early constellations. What i find weird is that the movement is a 353 movement, shouldn’t the 353 always be a ‘date’ movement? Dials seems, all be it in a very bad condition, original.

    So it’s either one of three things:

    A very early Connie and quite a rare piece.

    A rare 2737 18k case with a different movement and dial put in at some point during its life.

    A complete mess of put together parts.

    I know the dial/case/movement aren’t in the best shape (understatement) so please don’t tell me that. This post isn’t about the condition.

    I hope anyone with some more knowledge about early Connie’s or the 2737 case can tell me something about this watch.

    Kind regards.
    FAAD028A-9F83-4BD5-BE96-57C947A3BA63.jpeg B1465A0A-2A02-4B81-9A7E-4ABD253E62DB.jpeg 089BF060-ECB6-4E39-BC8C-725D9DC44080.jpeg 2C2D351D-34F4-4550-A4DC-4B1D3F81092B.jpeg
     
    Edited Oct 16, 2019
  2. omegastar Oct 16, 2019

    Posts
    1,836
    Likes
    5,323
    It is a ref. 2737 and not 2373.
    Reference 2737 is a rare Trésor model with screw down case back and 35,5 mm. diameter.
    Anyway not a Constellation and it should have cal. 354.
     
    Epictetus and chronos like this.
  3. vandesteeg Oct 16, 2019

    Posts
    82
    Likes
    121
    My bad, got some numbers mixed up after reading too much.
     
  4. vandesteeg Oct 16, 2019

    Posts
    82
    Likes
    121
  5. omegastar Oct 16, 2019

    Posts
    1,836
    Likes
    5,323
    This error is due to a picture of a put together 2737 Constellation that is displayed in Omega AJTT.
     
  6. vandesteeg Oct 16, 2019

    Posts
    82
    Likes
    121
    Thank you for your response! I guess my first feeling was right then. Too bad someone messed up a tresor to put this together.