Forums Latest Members
  1. curuba Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    Hi,

    I am absolutely new to vintage watches.

    Can someone help me find out if the watch is real?

    Unfortunately there is no photo of the movement.

    Thank you in advance.
     
    348B5C86-3B0A-4316-AC26-B437F14EE5F1.png D7F8F9DB-553D-4976-8728-AED16ACB2F14.png 6FD04D26-3C0F-4FC5-A8E7-953892FC3776.png 40427565-144B-4D0D-AC8E-685E28640492.png
  2. padders Oooo subtitles! Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    8,982
    Likes
    13,922
    This is not vintage, it is a quartz movement Connie from within that past 10-15 years and you are therefore asking in the wrong place. The only major issue I can see is the missing caseback screw which means it is probably no longer water resistant. I wont swear to it being genuine as modern Connies are outside my province but there is no major tell if it is fake to my eye at least.
     
    Mark020 likes this.
  3. Zapatta Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    1,438
    Likes
    11,129
    This should be more than enough
     
    Snimka zaslona 2022-01-11 103853.png
    lindo likes this.
  4. curuba Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    Oh, thanks a lot. You may notice that I am new to this.
     
  5. curuba Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    What do you mean?
     
  6. Zapatta Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    1,438
    Likes
    11,129
    Font of the dial doesn't match original font from this model. Looks like somebody used a sharpie.
     
  7. Skipper_S Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    374
    Likes
    501
    In other words: Run away...... ::facepalm2::
     
    Zapatta, felsby and StudebakerHawk like this.
  8. padders Oooo subtitles! Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    8,982
    Likes
    13,922
    Can you find us a comparison photo? I agree the text looks a little thick and clumsy but I have handled an original of these and I am not convinced the font is wrong. I wouldn't dismiss that based on one slightly out of focus photo. Don't forget, this is not a 1960s model so all that knowledge doesn't really apply, these just aren't as nice as the classic models.
     
  9. Zapatta Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    1,438
    Likes
    11,129
    There is no way this watch left the factory with that sloppy print. This isn't expected on a modern watch, I could understand if its vintage Connie, but not a modern one. Also, I've never seen Constellation from this era with applied script and logo.
     
  10. curuba Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    For me the Omega lettering looks suspicious. There is a big gap between the G and the A.
     
  11. Geezer Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    394
    Likes
    1,158
    The dial looks fake to me and the laser engraving on the clasp looks cheap.

    Also the Roman numerals engravings on the bezel are very off.
     
  12. sonicosa Jan 11, 2022

    Posts
    925
    Likes
    2,131
    The observatory engraving looks like Bezos' Blue Origin rocket.
     
  13. base615 Jan 12, 2022

    Posts
    1,024
    Likes
    3,926
    I’m no expert on these more modern connies (nor am I an expert on vintage ones but I’ve owned a fair few, including redials) but the Constellation text looks all wrong to me. Given it’s quartz, not in great condition and suspect (to me), I’d leave it alone. Others may correct me.
     
  14. ken_hodson Jan 13, 2022

    Posts
    193
    Likes
    407
    A photo of a quartz Constellation from around 1996 for comparison. The font definitely looks off on the OP's watch
     
    20220113_165818.jpg
    Zapatta likes this.