Hi, I would like to share with you guys my new acquisition - the Constellation F300hz réf 198 003- announced all original (crown, crystal, caseback, hands, dial and bracelet) The best surprise was indeed the bracelet because it is a 1039 (EL 516) Anyway I have few questions if someone can help I would appreciate 1- I have no idea of the production period - I can't see a S/N like in mechanical movement, any thoughts? 2- there is no date engraved on the clasp - 1039 + N°13 - what does it mean? now few pictures
Mine says hello! Just got it the other day! https://omegaforums.net/threads/wit...ads-i-decided-to-visit-one.50098/#post-601096 As for production period you can check out Omegas vintage archives online and there's also this for serial numbers... http://chronomaddox.com/omega_serial_numbers.html
Why not? It is right there under where it says Omega 1250, and over where it says unadjusted. Although I can't quite make it out in the picture.
@Pvt-Public You're right I didn't seen it before, thank you The S/N starts with 32xxxxxx so circa 1970 if I am referring to the link provided by @Jwit
I'm curious about your case back... or I should say my case back. Mine does not have the observatory in it. It is a simple blank case without any markings or engravings. Does anyone happen to know when these were changed or why there is any variation?
Hey @JC75 - nice macros. It's obvious you have at least a half decent camera and are handy with it. Diffuse your light source a little and the pics will be a little less harsh.
@ulackfocus Thank you for the advice, I will be more careful with the light source next time I actually use my iPhone 6S + the macro kit from Olloclip
As far as I understand constellations should have the observatory... blank backs tended to go on geneve/no model f300s.
I wonder what Omega was thinking in those days when it came to marketing. The above watches are very high quality (case, movement, etc.) but so similar yet represent three families: Seamaster, Constellation and f300 (?). Anybody has an idea?
Hmmmm I'm guessing my case back may be incorrect then... time to do some research and maybe source a correct one.
Yours is a 198.003 though - so maybe smooth casebacks were provided as an option for adding engravings?