From what I know:
- dial seems re-done at some point: I have never seen the 'constellation' leaning leftwards like that (or it might be the pics out of focus). Swiss made is missing also. Yes, I agree, I can't see the serrifs, font looks smudged.
- neither have I seen the cal-number 'just engraved': might be that this particular part of the movement was lost somewhere and same part from an other cal is used? And then just stated 1020 to be sure that somewhere the cal is mentioned? Yes, I agree, movement is either a transplant (1020 instead of a 1021) or parts cobbled together, not chronometer rated at all.
- dials states 'chronometer', which always implies that the movement is 'adjusted' To Five (5) Positions
- bezel seems to be worn rather much too Yes, it is no longer nice and crisp
All in all: I would stay far away from it. Yes, I agree
Click to expand...