Forums Latest Members
  1. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 13, 2012

    Posts
    26,988
    Likes
    32,696
    Figured I'd start a thread about this because something that keeps on coming up is that the 8500 is a very thick movement and even some very reliable and knowledgeable people keep saying that, primarily due to the fact that the Planet Ocean 8500 is a rather thick watch.

    Just as a basis for comparison:

    Omega Cal 8500/8501: 29mm diameter 5.5mm thickness (5.6mm for Cal 8501)
    Omega Cal 1120: 25.6mm diameter 4mm thickness
    Omega Cal 2500: 25.6 diameter 4.1mm thickness
    Omega Cal 1164 (ETA 7750): 30mm diameter 7.9mm thickness
    Rolex Cal 3135: 28mm diameter 6mm thickness
    Rolex Cal 4130: 30.5mm diameter 6.5mm thickness
    Omega Cal 491 (vintage): 28mm diameter 5.55mm thickness
    Omega Cal 501 (vintage): 28mm diameter 5.55mm thickness
    Omega Cal 564 (vintage): 27.9mm diameter 5mm thickness
    Omega Cal 321 (vintage): 27mm diameter 6.74mm thickness

    So in other words, the Cal 8500 movement is thinner than the Cal 501 movement in this watch:

    [​IMG]
     
    Leandrobgoulart likes this.
  2. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 13, 2012

    Posts
    26,988
    Likes
    32,696
    It also frequently comes up among sub owners claiming that the Cal 8500 is "too thick" when the reality is its the 600M water resistance of the Planet Ocean coupled with its displayback that result in the height of the current PO. Personally its not a big deal to me but at least there is a good potential for some thin watches in the future based on this calibre.
     
  3. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 13, 2012

    Posts
    26,988
    Likes
    32,696
    Here's the datasheet with the Cal 8500/8501 specifications listed:

    Screen Shot 2012-08-14 at 11.17.14 AM.png
     
  4. STEELE Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    178
    Likes
    836
    ... but putting a 5.5 mm movement in a beefy case leads to a "thick" watch. I've tried it on a few times but still find it too heavy on the wrist. Not sure I could get use to it but keeping a hopeful and open mind as I love the look and idea of an in-house movement.
     
  5. ulackfocus Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    BrianMcKay likes this.
  6. The GMT Master Chris @ ΩF Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    227
    Likes
    65
    Interesting, always nice to find out a bit more information about this most remarkable movement!
     
  7. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,835
    I would love to see this movement in a 37-38mm case time only no date stainless steel case with a black piepan dial with white gold arrowhead markers. That I would pay boutique retail prices for!
     
  8. ulackfocus Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    I would pay their asking price of $4700 for a 38.5 mm AT on a strap if they could put the sunburst blue dial on it.
     
  9. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    26,988
    Likes
    32,696
  10. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    My personal favorite of the 8500's is this one:
    43113412103001-20.png
    The sapphire case sides as well as case back really looks cool in person and the size is great
     
  11. ulackfocus Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    Is that the 41 mm model?
     
  12. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    Which one? The one I posted is 41mm.
     
  13. ulackfocus Aug 14, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    The one you posted is the one I was asking about.
     
  14. justinsyndicate Aug 31, 2012

    Posts
    16
    Likes
    6
    I wonder if they will ever offer a solid caseback for the PO8500 so it can sit a 1mm lower or so... If they did I'd buy.
     
  15. astrosfan Sep 1, 2012

    Posts
    95
    Likes
    54
    Yes yes yes, and yes!