Forums Latest Members

Omega Beta 21: Battery retaining prong/screw has extra spacer!!

  1. Dualmonitors May 20, 2019

    Posts
    80
    Likes
    63
    Dear All:

    I just received an Omega Beta 21 in seemingly great condition, but upon opening the case back, besides the gasket having turned to goo, the battery retaining prong and screw has an extra spacer!

    The battery that was in the watch was an Energizer 357/303, which is NOT the current correct replacement battery for this movement, according to Omega. The Renata 386 is the proper replacement.

    The Energizer 357 which is in my Beta 21 is thicker than the correct Renata 386 battery.

    I thought that i'd just take out the incorrect battery Energizer 357 and put in the correct Renata 386 and i should be fine. Wrong! Upon taking out the Energizer 357, i put in the Renata 386, only to discover that even screwing the battery retaining prong's screw all the way in, the prong was much too high, i.e. away from the battery's + surface. Upon closer inspection, there is a spacer(!) in the screw! (Pictures attached)

    I thought that this could not be correct as Omega's own service pages said Renata 386 is the correct replacement battery.

    the Energizer 357 is thicker, so the spacer made that work.

    while the spacer has the same copper color as the battery retaining prong and the screw and thus looks "original", i am guessing that it couldn't have been original and that someone had added the spacer in.

    may i please ask the good folks here if that is true please? What should i do?

    @Tom Dick , et al: I would be most grateful for any knowledge, advice, if you don't mind.

    Thank you.
     
    2019-05-20 13.32.15.jpg 2019-05-20 13.32.25.jpg 2019-05-20 13.33.00.jpg 2019-05-20 13.37.47.jpg
  2. webvan May 20, 2019

    Posts
    606
    Likes
    320
    The 357 is in fact the correct battery for the Omega 1300 movements. Anyway it's just a capacity/thickness issue, voltage is identical.
     
  3. Dualmonitors May 20, 2019

    Posts
    80
    Likes
    63
    @webvan: thank you kindly for your comment.

    i looked it up to the extent possible online and found this internal Omega manual for watchmakers (please see attachment below).

    it clearly says that for Calibre 1300, the old battery was the 354 Renata, and the current Silver Oxide replacement is the 386 Renata.

    Ideally, if another kind reader of this forum who owns an Omega Beta 21 might kindly look at their battery retaining prong and its screw, and see if under the prong (as picture in my earlier post above), they also have such a spacer or no spacer?

    the other issue: the additional height of the 357 Renata over and above the height of the officially recommended Renata 386, might just touch the case back! That might introduce a serious short circuit.

    Hopefully, others with the Omega Beta 21 might look at their battery retaining prongs and see whether or not they have a spacer.

    Thank you so much!
     
    Omega Battery Replacement Types.JPG
  4. webvan May 20, 2019

    Posts
    606
    Likes
    320
    I own two 1300s and both came with and take the 357 battery. My 1301 on the other hand takes the 386.
     
  5. JackDaniels83 May 21, 2019

    Posts
    228
    Likes
    264
    There are battery retainers in two different heights. The correct retainer and the according battery only depends on the case style. High retainer: Renata 357, low profile retainer: Renata 386. This rule is applicable for all Beta 21 movements, no matter what manufacturer it was used by.
     
  6. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker May 21, 2019

    Posts
    26,343
    Likes
    65,049
    Indeed batteries are determined by both movement and case...
     
  7. Uscjake87 May 21, 2019

    Posts
    300
    Likes
    431
    On a slightly related note: I still dont understand the difference between caliber 1300 and 1301 besides the stem position. The crazywatches site mentions cosmetic upgrades on the 1301 page. Was this Omega's way of simply differentiating the 9 o clock and 3 o clock crown?
     
  8. webvan May 21, 2019

    Posts
    606
    Likes
    320
    Wasn't the story with the 9 o'clock crown that it was so accurate you would never need to use it to set the watch? It's a right pain to change the date though, on the 1301 as well!
     
  9. Dualmonitors May 21, 2019

    Posts
    80
    Likes
    63
    Re: the date change --

    is there any truth to the commonly written comment that one should NOT use the "push crown down and rotate the crown while keep the crown pressed" date change method?

    people have written about that and said this "press crown down..." date change method strips the plastic date wheels often. with the plastic date wheels not easy to find/buy, people have said that we ought to merely use the slow method, just adjust the time many many days until you reach the right date.

    is there any truth to this please? Thank you.
     
  10. Uscjake87 May 21, 2019

    Posts
    300
    Likes
    431
    Metal date wheels are available that address the weak plastic teeth issue. I am curious about the method you describe on how to change the date.
     
  11. Dualmonitors May 21, 2019

    Posts
    80
    Likes
    63
    may i ask where might one buy a metal date wheel that is the required red background with white numbers please?

    thank you.
     
  12. Uscjake87 May 21, 2019

    Posts
    300
    Likes
    431
    This sellerPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network has some. I don't know the seller and the quality of the product.
     
  13. JackDaniels83 May 21, 2019

    Posts
    228
    Likes
    264
    First: The plastic date discs are only damaged when using the fast corrector while the date mechanism is also in contact with the disc. Do not change the date between 18:00 and 6:00 o'clock and everything should be OK.

    Second: I know the quality of the linked discs above. They are made in Germany and printed in Switzerland.
     
    Uscjake87 likes this.
  14. ccue888 Feb 21, 2023

    Posts
    8
    Likes
    3
    I have the identical problem like yours. So, what battery you have put it in eventually? 357 or 386?