Forums Latest Members
  1. Siipiveikko Mar 11, 2017

    Posts
    11
    Likes
    20
    Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Thank You for information advance.

    I got a watch from my father - he said it's an Omega, bought from Stockholm approx 1951/1952. There was not any logo frontside, either any information backside.

    I drove to an official Omega watch service workshop and I was suprised, when the clock was opened - it's the Omega 265! The serial number is 11782197, 15 jewels and Swiss made. I left my beauty to the service and just got it back yesterday. You'll probably understand how happy I am now, after propriete maintanance :).

    I sent a message to Omega with history information inquiry thru their webpages over 1,5 month ago, but I have not got any response there.

    Please could you tell me more of this model and history. I am wondering why there is not any information on the front neither backround?
     
    IMG_20170116_123057.jpg IMG_20170116_123533.jpg IMG_20170310_143559.jpg IMG_20170310_155759.jpg IMG_20170311_230948.jpg
    Edited Mar 11, 2017
  2. RancheroMaster Mar 12, 2017

    Posts
    45
    Likes
    13
    Siipiveikko likes this.
  3. ConElPueblo Mar 12, 2017

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    A Suverän should have a lower serial number and different movement... And a different case back.

    Crown and hands look like they are generic replacements and the dial has been renovated at some point.
     
    Siipiveikko and RancheroMaster like this.
  4. tdn-dk Mar 12, 2017

    Posts
    1,717
    Likes
    14,548
    It is not a Omega Suverän, the back of the watch would be different if ti was a Suverän and that model was from the 1940's and not with a cal. 265.
    You know the age and caliber, but if you want to know the reference you have to get it opened and in the inside of the back the reference number is stamped. You can see most of the caliber 265 references here (they were all made with several dial variations, only one is shown here) http://naligazone.com/index.php/data-watch/omega/20-watch/omega/caliber2/51-omega-cal-265

    The serial dates it to around 1947/48 so first sold in 1951/52 seems strange. http://www.thewatchguy.com/pages/OMEGASERIAL.html

    IMG_3469.JPG
     
    Siipiveikko likes this.
  5. François Pépin Mar 12, 2017

    Posts
    1,531
    Likes
    1,081
    You can trust ConelPueblo and tdn - they know what they are talking about!
    Just a quick remark: a movement from 1947-1948 could pretty well have been cased in 1949-50 and been first sold in 1951-1952.
     
    map782 and Siipiveikko like this.
  6. Siipiveikko Mar 13, 2017

    Posts
    11
    Likes
    20
    Thank you all my Omega friends of all advices!

    So I drove back to workshop early in this morning, Mr Clocksmith opened the backcover and I found mystic numbers 2622-1 there.

    This watch is definitely family keeper, my daughter loved it too. Fits nice also on young female wrist :)

    Have a nice spring time!
     
    IMG_20170313_103156.jpg IMG_20170313_103225.jpg
  7. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Mar 13, 2017

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
    Did you google the numbers?
     
  8. Siipiveikko Mar 13, 2017

    Posts
    11
    Likes
    20
    Yes, Omega seems to be "Military" model 2622-1, by the serial number manufacture year is between 1949-1950.

    I asked some more information from my father, he was working on a Swedish merchant vessel m/s Rydpoholm during 1950-1951, and he remembered that he bought that watch from Göteburg (Gothenburg) in autumn 1950. He used that Omega watch until first battery operated watches came to the markets and luckily he saved the watch even there was not any value for him.

    Now I'm lucky to get that, after me it goes to my daughter. My daddy (89 y.o) is happy too, when he saw the renovated Omega.

    M/s Rydboholm: http://www.faktaomfartyg.se/rydboholm_1946.htm
     
    Edited Mar 13, 2017
    ConElPueblo, TNTwatch and ruebekarl like this.
  9. S Dhar Mar 13, 2017

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    3
    Boss please help me by ur advice to my thread.
     
  10. tdn-dk Mar 14, 2017

    Posts
    1,717
    Likes
    14,548
  11. Siipiveikko Mar 14, 2017

    Posts
    11
    Likes
    20
    Hello,

    Well then, it must be somekind of misunderstanding (by me). I found the term when I googled 2622-1 somewhere - so it seems to be generic marketing for military style watches?

    And I still do not understand why there is not any Omega logo at front? Could this be as an early 1950's fake watch made by original spareparts?
     
    Edited Mar 14, 2017
  12. Bumper Mar 14, 2017

    Posts
    627
    Likes
    1,156
    Very likely its been cleaned off at some point. Notice a lot of the markers are also gone, perhaps the same time the hands were changed?
    2622.JPG
     
    Siipiveikko likes this.
  13. Banner Roar Mar 14, 2017

    Posts
    1,014
    Likes
    2,580
    ConElPueblo likes this.