Omega 2576 bumper - correct?

Posts
24,360
Likes
54,217
It may be fine, but the low-res photos aren't good enough to really evaluate the dial IMO.
 
Posts
474
Likes
1,187
I'll play desite the less-than-ideal pics: given the crown's been replaced, you know the watch has been opened/serviced. When I'm considering a watch, this always factors into things.

The hands--again, just from these pics--seem to have lighter lume than the plots. I've only handled maybe half dozen 2576s, but the ones I've seen usually have matching lume. So that'd give me pause--though, to be clear, I'm not an expert.

The dial seems basically fine; the Swiss might be hidden by the tension ring, or by the angle of the photos.

The case looks fine; nothing that'd overly concern me.

I think at 700 euro it seems basically a safe bet.
 
Posts
1,534
Likes
3,239
The hands may be replacements, or relumed but they are the correct style. The dial and case look fine to me.
 
Posts
3,785
Likes
20,205
A bumper with a "fat" bottomed S?
 
Posts
3,785
Likes
20,205
Or is that a fault of the pictures? Hard to tell...
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,708
I lean towards it being correct due to the fatter 15-30-45-60 hashmarks in the subdial, but for €700 I'd want more. That is a lot of money, IMO.
 
Posts
474
Likes
1,187
A bumper with a "fat" bottomed S?

I had the same instinctive response, but I've seen several original 2576s with that S as well; I think it's fine, fwiw.