NTTD or Heritage Seamaster 300.

Posts
27
Likes
67
Hi everyone.

I had my heart set on purchasing the heritage Seamaster 300 with bracelet and blue dial as I love the sandwich effect and lollipop second hand. When I went to take another look at the watch at the boutique, they happened to have a NTTD with mesh bracelet, and after trying on that beauty, it’s now starting to play on my mind as a serious contender. Obviously these are two very different watches aesthetically and the looks side of things is down to personal choice, however any input to the following would be greatly appreciated:


  • Is purchasing a NTTD which has an older and ‘lower spec’ movement compared to the 300 sensible, or is the movement a proven workhorse that shouldn’t factor negatively in my decision-making process?

  • Would it be more prudent to purchase the NTTD now whilst I can, as some variant of the Seamaster 300 will always be available to purchase at a later date, whereas the NTTD is a onetime only deal?

  • Is the extra cost for the NTTD actually justified, or am I paying a premium for titanium and the Bond link (the latter actually puts me off a little)?

  • Are there any other differentiating factors between the two that I haven’t thought about, or any steers on why you would go for one over the other?

If it helps, this would be a second watch, my other being a Speedmaster 3861 sapphire. 75% of my wardrobe is blue, the remainder being yellow and brown (with the odd bit of red and green) and I tend to be more casual than smart. The watch would be my go-to summer watch, hence going down the Seamaster route - oh, and I love Omega!


Many thanks in advance… here’s what they look like on my wrist:


 
Posts
2,703
Likes
3,601
I was in the same boat recently, as I seriously considered the NTTD before I settled on the 300 Heritage. My reasons, in no particular order:

1. Price. Couldn’t get past the $2k (on NATO) or $3k (on mesh) price increase. And that price is even more if you can get a discount on the heritage. I got mine through a Grey dealer for a good discount which made the price difference even more.

2. The movement in the 300 heritage has the jumping hour complication, which makes it nicer for travel.

3. Don’t like the mesh bracelet on the NTTD at all - the bracelet on the 300 heritage is outstanding. I’ve tried it on NATOs and straps but go back to the bracelet immediately. It’s just about perfect. The best bracelet Omega has eve made in my opinion.

4. The all-bushed titanium finish is nice, but I do like a few polished surfaces to give my luxury watch a little bling!

Ultimately, I decided the 300 heritage was more in line with my style than the NTTD. I can appreciate how beautiful it is, but is ultimately isn;t for me.
 
Posts
9,919
Likes
20,928
I've owned a Speedmaster for more than 7 years and wanted to add a Seamaster to my collection, my decision was split between these two. But the NTTD just spoke to me more, simple as that.
 
Posts
275
Likes
989
It's your watch.. You have to wear and to like it. Choose what you like or love more listen to your heart.

Best

Alex
 
Posts
245
Likes
495
I have owned both, ended up keeping the Heritage. I love the NTTD, it is an amazing watch, the overall design is great. I hope the next gen 300Diver takes some of those design elements(lumed Bezel and no date version). However, i prefer the bracelet, overall look, and color of the Heritage, so that was my choice
The mesh is nice, but just not what i preferred wearing.
 
Posts
420
Likes
490
While the Bond model is a cool watch I think the modern 300M design works best with a modern color scheme such as the regular blue or black models (and the ceramic flash they bring to the table). This tropical one might age badly. Also I cannot justify the markup.

So, the heritage has my vote.
 
Posts
10,446
Likes
16,336
I’d your wrist big enough for either? The NTTD is the smaller watch but the bracelet has issues meaning it doesn’t work for everyone. The 300 is a bit of a bloater and in my view only works if you have a big 7.5”+ wrist. neither work on skinny people. The differences in movements are academic and trivial.
 
Posts
114
Likes
106
I have the Heritage 300 with Blue dial and love it. Originally, I intended to buy a Sea Master Diver 300M in Blue but the Heritage is more versatile (sporty and dressy instead of sporty only.) The Blue dial will probably work better with your wardrobe too. My cloths are predominately blue as well.

The No Time To Die is a great looking watch but I didn't even consider it because it was just outside of the price range I had in my head. I have also heard people say that the mesh bracelet with clasp is a bit too thick.

With all of that said if I ever saw a great price on a No Time To Die I'd be tempted to add it to the collection, but it wouldn't be replacing the Heritage 300.
Edited:
 
Posts
274
Likes
266
Unpopular opinion: neither.

The 300 is a vintage-inspired homage, and the NTTD is finicky and overpriced. I’m just not a fan of faux-tina.

There are several real vintage watches easily attainable at this price range. Additionally, if you want a blue diver, get the 300M Professional in blue on a strap, and get a mesh SS bracelet. Pure perfection!
 
Posts
29,674
Likes
76,836
I’m just not a fan of faux-tina.

I like the real thing too...



Pic stolen from another site...
 
Posts
76
Likes
113
I owned a 300 for a short while. I never connected with that watch. The indexes felt washed out and the watch was just too neutral for me. I now own the nttd. I was first in the ”doesn’t justify the premium” camp, but now that I own one I totaly understand why many like it. I don’t se the color combination as ”faux” - its more of a watch with a winning color combination. Best watch that I own.
 
Posts
289
Likes
210
@Draskers Get both? Haha, either way let us know what you end up with. If it were me I would go with the Seamaster 300. I just like it better based on looks & appearance. The case back on the 300 is see through so that's a plus for me. I also think the 300 would look great on any strap or bracelet. Both and great and good luck with your search!
 
Posts
10,889
Likes
12,819
Why not both?! 😀 That's what I did.
 
Posts
13
Likes
29
Bought Seamaster300 because its modest and looks like shit at first. Inside has very good calibre. And lume is fantastic once you see it in the dark.
 
Posts
27
Likes
67
Thanks for all your input and advice. I haven’t decided yet, as I’m still fighting the battle between heart and head, but I’ll let you all know which one I purchased when I finally pull the trigger.

just to cover off a couple of points raised, the first in terms of size - both photos in my original post are of me wearing the watches, so hopefully they don’t look stupidly large (if they do, please let me know!)

Secondly the lume colour or fauxtina isn’t an issue for me as I see at as a deliberate colour choice to match the aesthetics of each watch l rather than trying to deliberately convince people it is an older piece than what it actually is with ‘aged’ lume… I don’t think people are that gullible!

Anyway… it’s a tricky choice as I love both watches, as it looks like do some of you too.
 
Posts
245
Likes
495
To me the biggest negative with the NTTD, which is the reason I sold it, is the Milanese bracelet. It just is not comfortable with certain wrist sizes.
I have found the bracelet on the Heritage 300 to be one of the most comfortable of any watch I have owned. It gets by far the most wrist time. If they had a more traditional bracelet option for the NTTD, I think I would've kept it longer.
 
Posts
513
Likes
769
Bought Seamaster300 because its modest and looks like shit at first. Inside has very good calibre. And lume is fantastic once you see it in the dark.

Love the lume….
Edited: