Forums Latest Members
  1. Dablitzer May 24, 2014

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    I'm usually pretty sure about these scripts, but this one (not great pictures..) had me baffled.. The O In AutOmatic is very strange too..

    I wondered if it was a later incarnation of the 168.029 (late 60's) with a more modernised script? Or just a redial.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The seller says it came from his father and was never redone.. But has had a replacement crown.. I'm a bit on the fence.. Dubious to wether at the same time it was refinished.
     
  2. Dablitzer May 24, 2014

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    I found this on which looks quite similar....

    image.jpg
     
  3. John R Smith May 24, 2014

    Posts
    1,320
    Likes
    726
    It could well be perfectly OK, Alex, the problem is the seller's photos are so poor that you just can't tell . . .
     
  4. Dablitzer May 24, 2014

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    Thanks John,

    I know...:unsure: He has already taken a few pictures so I'm afraid to keep asking!
     
  5. Hijak May 26, 2014

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    Alex, if he wants to sell his watch he'll send you good pictures...regardless of how many it takes!
     
  6. Dablitzer May 26, 2014

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    I know, I always feel like they're trying to hide things when they don't want to do clear pictures. It's not that hard to point and shoot a camera!!? Anyway, I'm moving on now.. Bit pricey for such risk! :)