NOT a fake gold Connie 2853, but worth discussing

watchyouwant · Feb 8, 2021

Maybe it's time, to ban the word " Fake " on this forum . It is completely devalued by politicians and idiots, who label everything they don't know / don't like or want to discredit without any deeper knowledge of any facts. Start a meaningful discussion with facts and questions of being legit and search for answers. This forum is productive, big in research and knowledge . "Fake" is not a scientific / fact based description. Just my 2 cents....

Shabbaz · Feb 8, 2021

I was following this one and I really, really hoped I was the only one... 😁

iamvr · Feb 8, 2021

Shabbaz
I was following this one and I really, really hoped I was the only one... 😁

It seems like I need a new identity after today 😟.

Mark020 · Feb 8, 2021

Perhaps don't take it that serious but this one has not much which points into the direction of a fake.

Maskelyne · Feb 8, 2021

iamvr
It seems like I need a new identity after today 😟.

No need for that, just learn and be humble when posting. I recommends to change the title. (I asses the watch as all genuine, by the way.)

cristos71 · Feb 8, 2021

Peemacgee
It’s ideally someone like @cristos71 you need for gold 2852/3s ( no offence to anyone who has already posted) but it looks a little worn but fine to me.

Looks like a nice watch to me, I don't see anything at all to worry about

Petervl · Feb 8, 2021

Looks all original to me.

Thailand is no 1 source for repro dials

M'Bob · Feb 8, 2021

michael e
Every single person on earth has made a mistake at some time or other 👍

You obviously haven’t met my wife...

CLA05 · Feb 8, 2021

Are those the correct hands though?...
everything else looks A OK to me

riper009 · Feb 10, 2021

Looks good to me, crown is correct, hands correct, caseback (slightly worn) correct, overall quite good condition, seeing as the bezel and lugs are quite sharp, movement good aswell, I'd take it for a good price. 👍