Forums Latest Members
  1. tamura Nov 2, 2013

    Posts
    759
    Likes
    2,302
    I won this today - any idea which caliber should I expect? Reference?

    [​IMG]
     
    Bill Sohne likes this.
  2. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Nov 2, 2013

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,835
    cal. 501/505
     
  3. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Nov 2, 2013

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    Cal 351/354. Ref 2577
     
  4. Dablitzer Nov 2, 2013

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    Hoi, which Seamaster 3xx were chronometre rated?
     
  5. Hijak Nov 2, 2013

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    352
     
  6. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Nov 2, 2013

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795

    You mean which cal were rated as Chronometre? All the 352's and 354's (some were and some were not)
     
  7. Dablitzer Nov 2, 2013

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    Yah, I knew those two! :p I mean, is there any exception to the rule? or a chart that shows them?
     
  8. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Nov 2, 2013

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    The 2519 were built like Seamasters and powered by cal 333 (chronometre) but there was no Seamaster on the dial. I am not sure if they are considered as Seamasters or not.

    [​IMG]
     
    Dablitzer likes this.
  9. mac_omega Nov 2, 2013

    Posts
    3,176
    Likes
    6,727
    I think they can be considered to be SMs
     
  10. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Nov 3, 2013

    Posts
    4,418
    Likes
    11,222
    Case looks like 2577 but caseback looks different from all the 2577 ones I've seen. Curious to see what it's like on the inside. :)
     
  11. tamura Nov 3, 2013

    Posts
    759
    Likes
    2,302
    Maybe a franken... It should arrive on wednesday.
    Thank You all.
     
  12. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 3, 2013

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,717
    Don't think it is a frankenwatch. Everything looks consistent to me. The band may not be original to the watch, but these were almost always dealer-installed options anyway.

    I see a vague outline of a Hippocampus on the back. This is similar to the very early Speedmaster and Seamaster 300 from the late 1950's.

    Capture.JPG
    These are considered rare and desirable by collectors. Not sure if there was a special case reference for these engraved backs.

    My guess is that there is a cal. 505 under the caseback.

    Nice purchase,
    gatorcpa
     
  13. tamura Nov 5, 2013

    Posts
    759
    Likes
    2,302
    Thanks gatorcpa
    the watch has arrived today, it is beautiful. Cleaning was easy, but I could not open it.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The biggest surprise was the size, it is 36,5mm without the crown!
    [​IMG]

    The Dial looks original to me, but the MOY test doesn't work!!??
    [​IMG]

    need a watchmaker
    tamura
     
    kyle L likes this.
  14. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 5, 2013

    Posts
    26,986
    Likes
    32,691
    Case looks quite nice
     
  15. Dablitzer Nov 5, 2013

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    Looks nice, did you polish it? looks like the tarnish cleaned off nicely.
     
  16. John R Smith Nov 5, 2013

    Posts
    1,320
    Likes
    726
    The dial certainly looks original, and has patinated very evenly. Most of the run-down look was just dirt :thumbsup: The case looks the same as a 2577 but the size is too large for that. The MOY test does not seem to be quite as applicable to these Seamasters as to the Connies, here is an original 2577 dial with the cross hairs similar to yours -

    2577 Seamaster Chrono.jpg
     
  17. Privateday7 quotes Miss Universe Nov 5, 2013

    Posts
    5,753
    Likes
    2,903
    Congrats on the watch.......quite attractive catch.
    Superb photo taking, too :thumbsup:
     
  18. Northernman Lemaniac Nov 5, 2013

    Posts
    4,424
    Likes
    18,135
  19. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 5, 2013

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,717
    If the watch is functioning (looks to be in good shape from the photos) it should be easy to tell if it is a bumper or rotor automatic. From what little I can see, this looks like a rotor model to me as it seems to be slighly thinner than my Ref. 2577.

    Problem is that I can't find a case reference for a Seamaster Chornometre with a cal. 501/505 automatic and a screwback case.

    So I'm curious as to what you have there. A trip to the watchmaker is in order I think.
    gatorcpa
     
  20. tamura Nov 7, 2013

    Posts
    759
    Likes
    2,302
    Hi Thanks
    Dablitzer
    Only a cleaning cloth was used
    Northernman
    Interesting links, thanks

    Mystery solved

    [​IMG]
    reference - movement no 16245654
    2854
    2920
    2 sc

    [​IMG]
     
    Northernman likes this.