Forums Latest Members
  1. omegaman Jun 12, 2016

    Posts
    255
    Likes
    379
    Not sure if mentioned already... there is a nice SM300 auctioned at Bonhams on June 22nd:

    https://www.bonhams.com/auctions/23511/lot/19/

    Interestingly the (later) added A in front of the issue number 205 had been engraved without / ... the same "mistake" happened the MoD on the 204, so just one number earlier (all other "A" I have seen are engraved with an /).

    Maybe the engraver had one beer too much that day? [​IMG]
     
  2. watchlovr Jun 12, 2016

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    Looks correct to me, any other opinions?
    Here's the 204 back with the same missed /

    Screen Shot 2016-06-11 at 00.17.38.png
     
  3. knvqn Jun 12, 2016

    Posts
    133
    Likes
    62
  4. watchlovr Jun 12, 2016

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    Apples and oranges.

     
  5. redpcar Jun 12, 2016

    Posts
    3,684
    Likes
    7,851
    .............also seller states the dreaded "near mint" in this auction ::facepalm2::
     
  6. CajunTiger Cajuns and Gators can't read newspapers! Jun 12, 2016

    Posts
    2,678
    Likes
    9,741
    There is nothing mint or Military about this watch unless the NATO confused you, why are you posting this here?...or are you the seller?
     
  7. Nactex Jun 14, 2016

    Posts
    338
    Likes
    263
    Because some people don't know all of the nuances about these watches. May be all Seamaster 300's with BT's look similar.
     
  8. watchlovr Jun 14, 2016

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    Maybe they do, but the chap did not post a BT SM300, it was a 12 dial, date version, non military and in pretty poor condition to boot.

     
  9. knvqn Jun 14, 2016

    Posts
    133
    Likes
    62
    2 apples, or 1 orange.
    My bad. I was a bit too hasty when posting that link, most likely reflects my ignorance on watches. I came across the watch while browsing here, and thought I could do a beneficial act by offering a "real" alternative, which waa not the case. I am not the seller...
     
  10. timjohn Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    1,138
    Likes
    6,682
  11. OmegaCal66 Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    219
    Likes
    284
    Epic battle between two bidders, if only one of the guys hadn't phoned in in might have been 10-15K!
     
  12. OMGRLX a RolexBear in disguise Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    1,151
    Likes
    2,989
    :eek: :eek: :eek:
     
  13. Fost Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    2,052
    Likes
    5,838
    ...and the SM300 became untouchable...
     
    Lonestar, Baz9614 and OMGRLX like this.
  14. Jones in LA Isofrane hoarder. Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    4,769
    Likes
    41,306
    I wonder how many Forum members just realized they have a $100k watch in their collection?
     
    Finrod Felagund, tpatta and OMGRLX like this.
  15. OMGRLX a RolexBear in disguise Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    1,151
    Likes
    2,989
    (Laughing all the way to the bank! -insert sinister laugh-)
     
    timjohn likes this.
  16. JohnSteed Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    So ..... Buyer.....simply had to have it .... ?
     
  17. OMGRLX a RolexBear in disguise Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    1,151
    Likes
    2,989
    And the craziest thing is, this got me thinking...What if, theoretically, I could sell mine for 100k?
    I still couldn't do it! I love my sm300 so much! Now, THAT'S crazy, isn't it? :D
     
    CajunTiger, Baz9614 and watchknut like this.
  18. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Anyone have a extra spare Ⓣ in their parts bin?
    Preferably white on a black background.
     
    Baz9614, OMGRLX and watchknut like this.
  19. watchknut New watch + Instagram + wife = dumbass Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    4,025
    Likes
    13,790
    What is crazy is that I was searching the interwebs and saw an archived sale from Zaf when he sold a mil300 for $1,799!!!

    And to think back in the day when I was chasing vintage Subs in the $1-2k range, I turned my nose up at the 300 because it wasn't a Rolex...oh to have a time machine!
     
    KstateSkier, Baz9614 and OMGRLX like this.
  20. OMGRLX a RolexBear in disguise Jun 22, 2016

    Posts
    1,151
    Likes
    2,989
    You turned your nose at the 300 in favor of the sub? :whipped:
     
    Baz9614 and Dash1 like this.