Forums Latest Members
  1. kirker Aug 16, 2014

    Posts
    2
    Likes
    7
    And also new to the forum, though I've lurked intermittently for a while. I recently had the opportunity to purchase a Speedy c. 321; what I didn't know until after it arrived -- and after I did some research -- was that it's the identical model that Neil Armstrong wore to the moon (and its serial number is less than 10,000 away for his). While I started collecting a couple of years ago now, mostly '50s-era Omegas, this is my first acquisition that one could genuinely classify as a "grail purchase." I was hoping you guys could provide some info/feedback I haven't been able to find on my own.

    I'm on assignment for several months and thus can't take the Speedy in for my watch specialist to inspect, but I've gathered the following about it: I'm fairly certain all of its parts are original, including its 1506/16 bracelet and crown, and they definitely all function properly, although I don't know the watch's last service date. (My only question would be about the pushers - do they *look* correct? I know they're supposed to be 5mm x 3mm.) The watch seems to keep near-perfect time. The bezel has the expected dot over the "0" in "90." If the watch has ever been polished, which I doubt, it was almost certainly a long time ago. The crystal has some normal wear-and-tear, but nothing a bit of PolyWatch can't take out. The caseback inside has the original Huguenin Frères stamp. Finally, the dial appears untouched, including its aged and no longer visible-at-night lume.

    What I could use some feedback from you guys on is where exactly my watch fits in the "Speedy hierarchy." I know the basics, e.g. the difference between a c.321 and c.861, but how does it stack up against, say, a pre-Professional 105.002? Is the fact that it's an identical model and year to the watches worn by Armstrong and most of the other Apollo astronauts *that* big of a differentiator? Thanks in advance for any feedback! IMG_3480.JPG IMG_3481.JPG IMG_3482.JPG IMG_3483.JPG IMG_3484.JPG speedy1_back.jpg
     
  2. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Aug 16, 2014

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,834
    Honest example that will clean up nicely. And yes the 105.002 is more uncommon and more valuable - worth 50-100% more than a 105.012 in similar condition.
     
    JohnSteed likes this.
  3. initialjh Aug 16, 2014

    Posts
    202
    Likes
    128
    i like that, congrats. seems all the original parts are there. just a service is pretty much all it needs. I wouldn't polish that case either, and maybe a gentle polish of the crystal is all it needs? congrats on a nice find.
     
  4. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 16, 2014

    Posts
    26,984
    Likes
    32,685
    Looks great
     
  5. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 16, 2014

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    Nice catch :thumbsup:
     
  6. JohnSteed Aug 16, 2014

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    Looks great, nice find.

    As for hierarchy, generally, vintage Speedys -

    these have straight lugs
    2915
    2998
    105.002
    105.003
    these have twisted lugs
    105.012
    145.012
    145.022
     
  7. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Aug 17, 2014

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,015
    homebrw, JohnSteed and initialjh like this.