New World Record by Bvlgari - 1.8mm (case) Mechanical “Ultra”

Posts
3,979
Likes
8,985
Bvlgari continues its annual streak (8 years ~running) of breaking some world record for thinness. This one is pretty bonkers.

1.8mm thin … not the movement, the entire case.

Thinnest mechanical was basically the only record not yet held by Bvlgari, held until now by Piaget’s Altiplano Ultimate Concept (2mm) as of 2018 (previously held by JLC’s 3.8mm watch). The Octo Finissimo Ultra is has now vested the Piaget concept by 10%.

50hr power reserve

Limited initially to 10 pieces (for the 10yr anniversary of the Octo—F) at EUR 400K a piece, notice that the QR code on the “barrel” will relate to a digital NFT to validate and blockchain-verify ownership and authenticity of the watch

E10DCF24-3754-4899-9700-29A08BAF0D39.jpeg B9A4A7C2-24FB-4B5D-8ABD-154BDCBE5351.jpeg
 
Posts
7,591
Likes
26,267
For $400k, I'd want something a little thicker.....

For $400k I'd like to be able to see all of the indices. :D
 
Posts
4,678
Likes
14,038
Interesting. They can top this next year by figuring out how to make a round u :D
 
Posts
5,898
Likes
25,269
What’s going on with this marker? It’s out of sync with all the other ones.

8A79B60F-2A71-4CB4-9C1E-44DDE16B697B.jpeg
 
Posts
1,771
Likes
8,922
Cool as a concept, marvelous engineering, but oh so hideous looking IMO
 
Posts
645
Likes
7,071
What’s going on with this marker? It’s out of sync with all the other ones.

8A79B60F-2A71-4CB4-9C1E-44DDE16B697B.jpeg
I think the picture above might have been a prototype. Here's the pic from Hodinkee, looks a little more finessed:

103611_001_cre-1.jpg
 
Posts
841
Likes
3,539
I saw a video on this watch yesterday. Absolutely insane. Its nice to see companies pursuing this and pushing the envelope. Reading about philosophies of different companies from the 40's and 50's thinnest was as much as pursuit as other horological complications.
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,985
Cool as a concept, marvelous engineering, but oh so hideous looking IMO

Tastes of course are like [noses]: everyone’s got their own

In the metal, [to me] one of the most exciting and innovative watches/brands of the last decade (not without its issues though) - and not to suggest it’s for everyone, of course.

F21B1DAB-5462-416F-90BC-3D0E96FCDB39.jpeg EE503003-DCA0-4317-9465-51BE9B520BD3.jpeg

But while Rolex is out here “wowing” by changing the sub dimensions by 1mm after 10 years, Bvlgari has broken (and in one instance re-broken it’s own and reclaimed) a world record in horology for 8 of the 10 years since the Finissimo was released, and none of those records have been re-captured yet by the usual brands (JCP, Piaget, etc.)

732DBD9E-71ED-4558-AB9D-B6FE1F4D527A.jpeg
 
Posts
9,458
Likes
45,056
Regardless of the looks that is amazing craftsmanship, engineering. I find it amazing. Interesting to see they are also using blockchain form authenticity/ownership I know at least one other of the big brands was doing that I already forgot which.
 
Posts
6,618
Likes
12,504
Many years ago Concord produced their Delirium IV quartz watch that was only 0.98 mm thick. But due to the thinness the crystal had a tendency to pop off when strapped on, it was essentially unwearable. Once you get ultra thin you run in to a whole bunch of new issues. These super thin watches get very fragile.
 
Posts
7,591
Likes
26,267
"The watch most coveted by wealthy anorexics worldwide."

– a poorly received marketing idea :D
 
Posts
1,525
Likes
4,989
i imagine every time you want to take a wristshot, the QR-code scanner pops up and takes you to their website :D :whipped:
 
Posts
546
Likes
2,542
Not personally a fan of the aesthetics but how-the-actual-fudge do you get 50 hours power reserve out of a squashed penny? :eek:

I find it strangely comforting in these tempestuous times that some people, somewhere, are massively over-engineering mechanical wrist watches just for the glorious, pointless sake of it. Carry on.
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,985
I wouldn't mind a minutes hand for 400K

Would you prefer cash or check?

75C106C7-3CF1-4227-9D24-C33F9699B239.jpeg



Interestingly on this point, Bvlgari managed to squeeze in a seconds indicator unlike the Piaget’s concept watch it overtook

6DEE1E8A-2723-4965-8A4A-1ABB9A3F1935.jpeg
 
Posts
7,278
Likes
33,699
Interestingly on this point, Bvlgari managed to squeeze in a seconds indicator unlike the Piaget’s

Aha, I thought it was one of those one handed Meistersinger type display's :thumbsup:
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,985
i imagine every time you want to take a wristshot, the QR-code scanner pops up and takes you to their website :D :whipped:

Actually, if you have a second phone, I recommend scanning the QR of the marketing example photographed above - it does, indeed, take you to a special website about this model, and among other interesting bits explains that unlike the marketing watch/photographs (eg above) the 10 production pieces will be a “vault” for the NFT smart contract on the blockchain
 
Posts
27,122
Likes
69,173
Many years ago Concord produced their Delirium IV quartz watch that was only 0.98 mm thick. But due to the thinness the crystal had a tendency to pop off when strapped on, it was essentially unwearable. Once you get ultra thin you run in to a whole bunch of new issues. These super thin watches get very fragile.

I suspect that this will also be mostly a display piece. It won't take much deflection to cause the train to either stop or be affected greatly.

Winding this would also be....interesting.

These projects are more about bragging rights than being practical, wearable watches.